Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

[Tobias Gondrom <[e-mail]>]

On 10/05/12 16:35, John C Klensin wrote:
>
> --On Thursday, May 10, 2012 15:59 +0800 Tobias Gondrom
> <[e-mail]>  wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>> sorry, maybe I did not articulate myself precisely enough. I
>> did not intend to say it would be published in real-time. What
>> I wanted to communicate is that we would collect that data
>> only during daytime and only with 2hours-granularity as it's
>> only meeting attendance in which room you are (and publish it
>> at any point in time later). However, we would keep it public
>> indefinitely (in the proceedings).
> Good.  My apologies for misunderstanding your intent.
>
>> Like you, I am very cautious about broadcasting my travel
>> plans. Plus, I am not only concerned about in advance and
>> real-time, but also about broadcasting to the public places
>> I've been in the past (or for that matter any personal
>> information).
> But it seems to me that takes us back to Russ's summary in that
> it is normal, and arguably necessary, for a standards body to
> record --and make available to those who are interested-- the
> identities of those participating in meetings.

I do not dispute that.
What I dispute is that "make available to those who are interested" 
necessarily leads to the need to broadcast the data (i.e. publish in the 
proceedings).
As we did in the past, we can equally achieve this openness by requiring 
that an interested person requests this data (including then providing 
his own identify) as we do at the moment.

Best regards, Tobias

> best regards,
>     john
>