IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Mon, 23 April 2012 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDD221F85B8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.966
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.966 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.367, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NRw9qlo2GJEy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B49421F8584 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagj5 with SMTP id j5so53015lag.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EC2zt+Y02vlFhszHTSBAN7r7wrRQwHLkJB5IlIkU5dQ=; b=LxYCNqBrPCTAnwbqI5Na3Cy/Z7qfGkNoenbx5Sh1+0Sz9LH9e4k5yoizmfQdy1iv1f eGhZCVut+Ig1ThUMhdNl1QQgKTavK1UyvkYFXD9d+6f1Ct7vpHcqie7Vbx7D6mFvlE1f pjr3ABBizNisvASSllhhhxtluVe6OIhv0ZX3hDTN5t/BLIMD8VeWQA2bUD115arEhiur Fix3uSVwI1yhpltVpcb3bFsp+jyppzEV03DL+Gc4QNCmhusHTflVHEBSQOwfViv/aqVQ ilbVBHiHPiCbgyWXHCXV6pFvEYjW2/6TQeLKKa6OnY5L1fVacHnETTy6ujg3GjT3ZFhP 10Kg==
Received: by 10.112.98.200 with SMTP id ek8mr6745297lbb.32.1335223211385; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.144.8 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2AC114D8-E97B-47A0-B7E0-9EF016DCB09F@ietf.org>
References: <2AC114D8-E97B-47A0-B7E0-9EF016DCB09F@ietf.org>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:19:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEEdYh5jj96W+qfqZ3UBu1tz0_KT1Gw1ZVnVh5RMbfWMYg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:20:13 -0000

email addresses have the virtual of uniqueness so I believe they
should be retained.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com


On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:31 AM, IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> wrote:
> At IETF 83, we had a discussion about the future of blue sheets, many spoke at the mic in support of the proposal.  There has been very little discussion on the mail list.  However, all of the discussion that I have see has been very supportive.
>
> The suggestion is three blue sheet changes:
> 1.  No longer ask for email address;
> 2.  Scan the blue sheet and include the image in the proceedings for the WG session; and
> 3.  Discard paper blue sheets after scanning.
>
> Please speak up if you think this is the wrong thing to do.
>
> Thanks,
>  Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email