Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> Mon, 07 May 2012 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <chair@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF80A21F85CC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2012 09:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tO4zdywTcnSh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2012 09:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1FB21F851B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 09:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E796312C7EB; Mon, 7 May 2012 09:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K8GgaONevteg; Mon, 7 May 2012 09:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-96-255-140-3.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.255.140.3]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DC0712C7E9; Mon, 7 May 2012 09:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMD0xToJuQrgSmaA7P8p0r_TX-Ne=+DPbwiLkrY-pEsbng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 12:02:32 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9151A484-2EFF-47DA-9531-E96C7279D9AD@ietf.org>
References: <97BB17A56A65B20E9FB38128@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <360B33DF-0603-4B86-B488-DDDBEDF2B10B@bbn.com> <64D096E2-78E1-4B4F-B227-42AB7B658FF6@cs.columbia.edu> <BE62B481-1FBD-4F82-92BA-EAC0D0519639@ietf.org> <CA+9kkMD0xToJuQrgSmaA7P8p0r_TX-Ne=+DPbwiLkrY-pEsbng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 16:02:34 -0000

Ted:

I will raise this with the IESG.  Of the many variants that were discussed, this was not one of them.

Russ


On May 7, 2012, at 11:50 AM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> As a clarifying question, did the IESG discuss whether the image of
> the blue sheets might be made available online under other terms of
> use, rather than within the proceedings?  For example, making these
> available to anyone with a tools login, so that anyone willing to
> register as a user has access, but they are not broadcast?
> 
> regards,
> 
> Ted Hardie
> 
> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 9:46 AM, IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> wrote:
>> We have heard from many community participants, and consensus is quite rough on this topic.  The IESG discussed this thread and reached two conclusions:
>> 
>> (1) Rough consensus: an open and transparent standards process is more important to the IETF than privacy of blue sheet information.
>> 
>> (2) Rough consensus: inclusion of email addresses is a good way to distinguish participants with the same or similar names.
>> 
>> 
>> Based on these conclusions, the plan is to handle blue sheets as follows:
>> 
>>  - Continue to collect email addresses on blue sheets;
>> 
>>  - Scan the blue sheet and include the image in the proceedings for the WG session;
>> 
>>  - Add indication to top of the blue sheet so people know it will be part of the proceedings; and
>> 
>>  - Discard paper blue sheets after scanning.
>> 
>> 
>> On behalf of the IESG,
>>  Russ
>> 
>