IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Tue, 12 April 2016 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084AE12E4B4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KP8m8b55RJWQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83CA012E1D4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id ot11so18018589pab.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mKaPYtyMcZmZn0rvjZiGDWWZ3Raz6Rjtvop51mloLzw=; b=CnS+xfhkd7IKQL+b8O6hsma4c+OiTwy6JHhqrCYOkckemmYIftg+SxXQbMOIABOJPN /ojO51H5ehYJlrM3vuaAPHkLjWpJjKe9ZGvzYc8r+W4w67RyaUQp31SVUTpFYmpBHryT vuFRINQW2Eii3025vObYViZ+cVwAYCToyodz09S/r/EVqLufB/Kp4LhFvmrhb5CuGQs7 lAfKv75FQoUQIqFUu2qEUKDwMF+lV5gDEWCZn+15zpF5dmdiF+RmOhNm8vZqhwzMUmvV bYfSQIcRIINWv0+RApl52X0EiW8izjzIp0acGmLg/OM3eCDIGyXS2iJJVGkve/B0JFvN rIOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mKaPYtyMcZmZn0rvjZiGDWWZ3Raz6Rjtvop51mloLzw=; b=AVxY1WGyGA7wZghuU1LVI0DLJcANyCWQ3VqG8HV2diYf4eDO/QDVD0baOZuqu0+896 XYyUiPcEuSMzzcxvrIZ4MDM33aEKh7u5ehaEo4S3D2Y5t0z8ANDfZ/13/ZfSrisY4MnW 21xhE2MtVk5AxMqxcG72jT/Ag6IWDvGwmIs/nfL7wlBfMFXPdljvbznUSMzTAlD1F/up AivnIG711Q+wsg1DyBKKB50YSfcrEl5Hjf9BKdJfusavlqGRWx2mG/TgoQ7Hc5MAeDsZ quxxqn96b6OF2SmyZ9PftKlrH7NF7Ee918jJtMU+xVHAVDlJ09FLryz07LqnFnB/WLhh AT6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW6GYT31VmKVDmpmbML+MVK1DJmM28MNVmW6C/mWC2ZdjB8VrzsfOiGekYm++6M1g==
X-Received: by 10.66.118.70 with SMTP id kk6mr6748413pab.74.1460486010127; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (216-67-8-215-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [216.67.8.215]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id fk10sm45354218pab.33.2016.04.12.11.33.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]
To: chopps@chopps.org
References: <m21t6d7c9t.wl%randy@psg.com> <570A67B4.3010206@comcast.net> <570AB3AF.2050401@gmail.com> <87twj99c6w.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <CAKe6YvMyp-DyeDwpPY6KYmbDbnpgnvVk_cUStnA32wmgDWcz3w@mail.gmail.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD233A62AA18@XMB122CNC.rim.net> <20160411104519.GA19092@gsp.org> <3F48466D-390C-4C18-B958-732AE3E46FF1@gmail.com> <20160411223403.GA6743@gsp.org> <87twj7eon7.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <20160412110839.GA20488@gsp.org> <8760vn82f2.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <570D2A34.1030700@gmail.com> <87bn5ehfkj.fsf@tops.chopps.org>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <570D3F91.2050200@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:33:53 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87bn5ehfkj.fsf@tops.chopps.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/l0DBVL8R7ExY82BEzoEIKZZ2Ym0>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 18:33:34 -0000

On 4/12/16 10:01 AM, chopps@chopps.org wrote:
> I know for a fact it is not how I and my co-chair run the IS-IS WG. I
> can't speak to whether other WGs are being run incorrectly. It's the
> responsibility of the participants and the ADs to make sure the
> chairs are not violating our own standards process though.

Well, I participate in working groups other than the ones
I chair and yes, there are working group chairs taking votes
and making decisions in meetings.  This is the way things are.
Ignoring how things are and hewing unreflectively to the ought-
to-be is one of the major things that got us to where we are
with NAT, among other problems.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email