IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Concerns about Singapore

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Sun, 10 April 2016 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADC512B067 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 03:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OF6CQlW__1YP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 03:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5976312B04A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 03:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id c126so123726491lfb.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 03:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=deWTneOcYWE6317mKJD0gjdXw8MWmkmAXDi3P/1xNoE=; b=heJT6yza1fzM/qf8eYoxmPsJBGRrTOchjsrVumiQTogv226AlFfHxKTxYpvP53JO+k WUEcvhyRfSBdZH+TAECqTYb9sX7baa+elPEv8N7QzJtNSAjqNhNaj2v8Vnk3WD6CYVjE 4tkpHAMcR0fNaGHA8FnJHB5bZJjwMr8pWeVibm84dOnEyTAJpDYmQBQ1OGGoQUAQU1uz 6aHIugdpnwiVxEaK44G4CsdTyeuzhgKIl+0ehW7aF6JK7BI48dTrK2Z/M2yBS6h14dNT WRA7jdqc+CLvL5sQZSDoKmpQ492XTmJ5lXQk7suDeyBY17JSeNOygJwO5zGheug6jYyR Xhrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=deWTneOcYWE6317mKJD0gjdXw8MWmkmAXDi3P/1xNoE=; b=Quw7CiTiy54HsFODYcw4oPNxENZ2KIrURvGBxkoCoPKmylbb+12RI9r7qMibxAQt1I cr6DFEJkOYFMXifn8dee1KmoHo5uBFppbyxmodk4NSmKActprS+wYALzUqLJmguYDdGh bgxLCCdIWxtysqj+DDrxlk50gFldGJ7Pjzzt8sMrMBJ97+40wD0eIoZtCCTIOivDH/Mu eOBMDsfLBStYHODTFRduwIm5tOZppyBw/P5fTy2uKwcvsuq+aRVy5EnMJaR8czY4Vg60 PkiX/5zgPRRFliPvSTQ/Ed8kfTLWjh7X+g0kPyv+BuonY7uHMUgNnfHt8QuBFkfR0E4R TPyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI4pM7S7ydFLGjnMAmJ5dKqk/oW/RFpWg4c6yOMfCLnyvFK05pNdfkrHp1fOPkvdA==
X-Received: by 10.25.165.20 with SMTP id o20mr6717598lfe.105.1460284927504; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 03:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.139] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id um4sm3538997lbb.1.2016.04.10.03.42.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Apr 2016 03:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13E234)
In-Reply-To: <m2fuuu75ls.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 12:42:05 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A74EB3D5-20E5-4788-9B49-93D31AE1382F@mnt.se>
References: <0D914666-C3D4-4CCE-AD5E-4E5B34EA1A73@piuha.net> <20160407182936.GA21340@pfrc.org> <CAB75xn780nNDjGa_Cc222J20-+1CCHt09Xp8KHzaK=n0xx51pg@mail.gmail.com> <5706B100.9040509@mnt.se> <CAB75xn6fmj84ROUtG5eUB3GerHx83hrEr3w5vSADY_g=BRg5FA@mail.gmail.com> <5706BA40.3060005@mnt.se> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1604072157240.31096@uplift.swm.pp.se> <A9B63A6D-3102-482F-8FFC-2E57A5FD8336@nic.cz> <16925.1460122349@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <m27fg77zst.wl%randy@psg.com> <57097077.7040703@comcast.net> <m2fuuu75ls.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/u2R6jV_RdpmFJdgMuCkFoCo95SY>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:42:11 -0000


Skickat från min iPhone

10 apr. 2016 kl. 00:57 skrev Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>:

>> Calling the Beijing meeting network open isn't really correct - we had
>> a reverse VPN to the Internet as it exists outside of the PRC.
> 
> false.  and i was the noc guy working it.
> 
>> We did registration in Maastricht simply to figure out the details
>> before we got to Beijing - I'm fairly confident that Maastricht
>> wouldn't have been different from the previous IETF's without the
>> upcoming Beijing meeting.
> 
> correct, but misleading.  maastrict was the same as beijing, though for
> different reasons.

That was the VAT issue, right?
> 
> randy
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email