Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY

[Allison Mankin <[e-mail]>]

I like Michael's original suggestion that there should be two meetings in
the last five and if there is not a third, then meeting some other
requirement, a choice of things like attended lots of past meetings, has a
defined role in a wg, ...

Others have noted this, but the two important goals of these criteria are:

Has attained a (minimal)  level of familiarity with IETF

Has a probability of attending in person for the Nomcom activities

Michael has crystallized in other posts the fact that Nomcom really needs
the in person time in order to work together, and IETF teally, critically
needs full attendance if Nomcom during the meeting(s) with interviews,
especially November, for the candidate interviews.