Re: [111attendees] Please change the Subject line [was Re: test]

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Fri, 23 July 2021 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE103A08FC for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jHUqRgdEiQeh for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E72733A0909 for <111attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339A9548042; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 18:12:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 2804E4E7B15; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 18:12:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 18:12:48 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 111attendees@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210723161248.GP57276@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <758515384.164289.1627031655741@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <0043DCA8-C794-4146-AC2A-F1600ACA2D98@tzi.org> <20210723132655.GI57276@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <914b8bfd-064f-974a-f997-bfda1a70cdad@labs.htt-consult.com> <CAPt1N1=kX6=A_6=HOFgTqTxu=V5Lui+GPd+A=nDXPPLC7_hLUQ@mail.gmail.com> <2D019E48-68B5-49E3-B315-4169F83146EE@tzi.org> <5C1EEE9E-AEB5-418C-B2E9-66EA1C839903@mjmontpetit.com> <CACTP9nuGWT4Sxn2N4KpAbNCOV2dss8kVYnfGK77Skzx-Esuj=w@mail.gmail.com> <23F43D08-87F6-469D-8CB3-620E94A3EBC1@gmail.com> <49E48950-1549-4CD3-8111-C70381F3F060@rfc1035.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <49E48950-1549-4CD3-8111-C70381F3F060@rfc1035.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/111attendees/6b9g6N7SAEkPYpAkWMKqPLvt3hE>
Subject: Re: [111attendees] Please change the Subject line [was Re: test]
X-BeenThere: 111attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 111 attendees <111attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/111attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 16:13:02 -0000

I think the ship of proper electronic message etiquette came in
the 80th and 90th with Emily Postnews, but i don't think it followed
us into the 21st century. Otherwise one would expect that an
organization obsessed with BCP and processes as the IETF would have a BCP for it.

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 05:03:00PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote:
> > On 23 Jul 2021, at 16:49, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Please change the subject line on this list to something close to the topic being discussed.   It’s clearly no longer about testing the attendee list.
> 
> And for bonus points, please trim the postings instead of appending the whole discussion thread over and over and over again.
>