Re: [111attendees] test
"Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com> Thu, 22 July 2021 17:10 UTC
Return-Path: <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A30B3A0977 for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.837
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.837 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vUfBxFAS5zq4 for <111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2499A3A0970 for <111attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id pf12-20020a17090b1d8cb0290175c085e7a5so5301016pjb.0 for <111attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VZCOK7rVuEH6BDkDVQmWv+DZkpPSzWOFNFGK6qHx8Qo=; b=h94NpHhgOSHxYlMBpZNhWSe+GYXt6Gu3vxaKjaHC1NY/lTWcYsCf1iL+Mxnk+RdiJB sY5GMVqL9ulFQ8lA1cnkeVgQfOooV5RIwJ0srVDBGXyZ72Fzv5DIAyzr5sLDGAz9RUXy y2+UW17aLMemoqGm0n/gpQNn07O7nyD6QYoS4o//vaVG0PzpjdSQ0lPt7g1HMYJ/OE2d 9J30SYxbFm97UYAAlhERIyGJRXrha4N1YHqtWt6Ws8k+429IgidWnQysJ50H8BzcuOJs w1uCnWuY6n/QbQ8JZKgqEwHIbn9nY/TRbt+HtM5+dyfJ1rOfyNbvjVc8zGEji/VeIRe6 hCNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VZCOK7rVuEH6BDkDVQmWv+DZkpPSzWOFNFGK6qHx8Qo=; b=plJC+pwmD+iFTQvnZLOKz455TU1TK+J+o8qsOAUfLPz+pz5HtolhyZaACFt5CCBcaz QNd1P+rzq4o22SA06NlJJxX2ePDoszJ28OfgMonvMXWrZ41XcOtmCbejgCVnJZRz5OpZ kOr0yloy+nDZQ2JO4/311v3SqbZuB4I+GFhedftGu0f8367Sz305N4fYs06tm+svWt/f Dn1vz4SpkZGwVC5Ia85cr3llYsVTJno11NybV4RuK07fxaqbhxDXfOjWzLanoERswABT 9/co8eNx043qRNJc4h5/8Ti2Eyi+PqFn3DwFZta1jxswRQVW4L0ah0zVa+K094YENlT2 ST7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hrw8B5y3EASR8gKmcm5BZnZl71pieTkKvA/1G6CgDxbImMJtz Yh+2P3JZzTS542yMGvqJRV4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlQpyr/QL6v2o2sGkrSBTdVCbtu9SxQPq0Kgmp3McasUN6I2PtKj1aeP3hO7brUOs4Mbz38g==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:6187:: with SMTP id c7mr889097pgv.349.1626973831441; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.89.104] ([2800:a4:2930:9e00:c142:1fb6:f7df:949f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b1sm3473875pjn.11.2021.07.22.10.10.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, 111attendees@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:10:27 -0300
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5757)
Message-ID: <F7AA1B7F-23E8-48FB-B89B-AB2DAF1F1F8A@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <af8652ed-179a-78d5-eb47-02302ba5e5c2@labs.htt-consult.com>
References: <c211bfe6-0ffb-b4d8-a3b8-840ab9ee0368@gmail.com> <af8652ed-179a-78d5-eb47-02302ba5e5c2@labs.htt-consult.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/111attendees/mYglGm4NAe9sCedmSd-KthCcIvg>
Subject: Re: [111attendees] test
X-BeenThere: 111attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 111 attendees <111attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/111attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 17:10:39 -0000
Robert is right here… we so far have been running on “social interaction credit” we accumulated over many meetings and many years… how long will that last is a big question mark. I definitely hope we can make it to Madrid in some form. /Carlos On 22 Jul 2021, at 14:06, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > On 7/22/21 4:52 AM, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: >> >> test >> >> It is strange there is no activity on the 111attendees email list at >> IETF, just a few days before the online meeting starts. >> > > Not so strange. May F2F weeks had no traffic until the weekend > prior. > > We have lost the social interaction. And what little we have we tend > to do poorly. I really hope we do make it to Madrid. > > Bob > > -- > 111attendees mailing list > 111attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees
- [111attendees] test Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [111attendees] test Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [111attendees] test ANURAG VIJAY AGRAWAL
- Re: [111attendees] test Jared Mauch
- Re: [111attendees] test ANURAG VIJAY AGRAWAL
- Re: [111attendees] test Ujjwal Sharma
- Re: [111attendees] test Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [111attendees] test Henk Birkholz
- Re: [111attendees] test Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [111attendees] test Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [111attendees] test Carsten Bormann
- Re: [111attendees] test STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [111attendees] test Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] test Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] building up interaction credit… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [111attendees] test Nigel Hickson
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] test Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [111attendees] test Michael StJohns
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] test Warren Kumari
- Re: [111attendees] test Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [111attendees] test Julia Urbina-Pineda
- Re: [111attendees] test Nigel Hickson
- Re: [111attendees] test Randy Bush
- Re: [111attendees] test Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test MORTON JR., AL
- Re: [111attendees] test John C Klensin
- Re: [111attendees] test Sanjeev Gupta
- Re: [111attendees] test Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [111attendees] test Carsten Bormann
- Re: [111attendees] test Randy Bush
- Re: [111attendees] test Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test Nigel Hickson
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] test Lars Eggert
- Re: [111attendees] [Ext] Re: test Paul Muchene
- Re: [111attendees] [Ext] Re: test Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [111attendees] test Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [111attendees] test Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] [Ext] Re: test Paul Muchene
- Re: [111attendees] test Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [111attendees] test Ted Lemon
- Re: [111attendees] [Ext] Re: test Henk Birkholz
- Re: [111attendees] test Andrew Campling
- Re: [111attendees] test Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test Carsten Bormann
- Re: [111attendees] test Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [111attendees] test Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [111attendees] test Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [111attendees] test David Brown
- Re: [111attendees] test Robert Moskowitz
- [111attendees] Please change the Subject line [wa… Bob Hinden
- Re: [111attendees] test Diego Dujovne
- Re: [111attendees] Please change the Subject line… Jim Reid
- Re: [111attendees] Please change the Subject line… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test Ted Lemon
- Re: [111attendees] multisite remote hybrid meetin… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [111attendees] The joyful benefits of (hybrid… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [111attendees] multisite remote hybrid meetin… Diego Dujovne
- Re: [111attendees] test of 111attendees list and … Oscar Garcia
- [111attendees] future hybrid meeting discuss (was… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [111attendees] test John C Klensin
- Re: [111attendees] multisite remote hybrid meetin… Diego Dujovne
- Re: [111attendees] Planning for hybrid meetings (… Jay Daley
- Re: [111attendees] test Stewart Bryant
- Re: [111attendees] test Stewart Bryant
- Re: [111attendees] test Chukwuka Odele
- Re: [111attendees] test Brian E Carpenter
- [111attendees] Hybrid meetings (was: Re: test) Lars Eggert
- Re: [111attendees] Hybrid meetings (was: Re: test) John C Klensin
- Re: [111attendees] Hybrid meetings (was: Re: test) Lars Eggert
- Re: [111attendees] test Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [111attendees] Hybrid meetings (was: Re: test) Jay Daley