Re: [111attendees] [Ext] Re: test

Thank you Alex, I look forward to the poll survey. 

Kind Regards,

Paul M

> On Jul 23, 2021, at 16:52, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> Le 23/07/2021 à 15:43, Paul Muchene a écrit :
>> I’m just wondering if there are currently any plans to have IETF 112 and subsequent meetings be conducted in a hybrid format.
> 
> I think I heard that depending on the results of the poll (an URL sent to earlier participants), they plan what to do with the next meeting 112.  That poll has some questions about acceptability of covid-related conditions at an f2f meeting.
> 
> Alex
> 
>> Kind Regards,
>> Paul M
>>>> On Jul 23, 2021, at 16:33, Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson=40dcms.gov.uk@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Good afternoon
>>> 
>>> Really good points re "hybrid"; this approach always being contemplated for IGF, will be very interesting to see how it works.
>>> 
>>> best
>>> 
>>> Nigel
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 14:27, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de <mailto:tte@cs.fau.de>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    I don't think this particular challenge (mixed online/in-person)
>>>    has really been getting enough attention.
>>> 
>>>    I for once think that it will only work well if the in-person
>>>    meeting part would require attendees even when being together
>>>    in a room to use their notebooks for discussions instead
>>>    of having a physical line at a single microphone, so that
>>>    there is more fairness between local and remote, but that
>>>    was never really discussed on manycouches or
>>>    picked up their documents. Yet i did hear it repeatedly
>>>    as a suggestion from other IEF'er that had to atend
>>>    remotely even before covid.
>>> 
>>>    Cheers
>>>        Toerless
>>> 
>>>>    On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:23:42AM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>>    > On 2021-07-23, at 11:14, Vittorio Bertola
>>>    <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org
>>>    <mailto:40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>>>    > >
>>>    > > I'd rather settle for "let the people who can and want meet in
>>>    person, as long as there are enough of them to make a meeting viable”.
>>>    >
>>>    > … and that, of course, means that this localized gathering is
>>>    then jointly joining the global online meeting, and not the other
>>>    way around.
>>>    > The tail/dog thing.
>>>    > Once that really works, we can more aggressively fall back to
>>>    multiple regional hubs, until global traveling gets easier again.
>>>    >
>>>    > Grüße, Carsten
>>>    >
>>>    > --
>>>    > 111attendees mailing list
>>>    > 111attendees@ietf.org <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
>>>    > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees__;!!PtGJab4!uq0kiim5PJv3UJLffZD8FU3J1JN-ggQFFVMP1dsHnMQsi1NxOFNy4fLEn7rnDjoId2nAmi8C$  [ietf.org]
>>>    <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees__;!!PtGJab4!sjf-y7T9JghR5haSK3KeyLFoMmsTQMS1aU2FdCDsKI7MmKriqqXMS2epCo8l1Q83M0Dzcb_z$>
>>> 
>>>    --     ---
>>>    tte@cs.fau.de <mailto:tte@cs.fau.de>
>>> 
>>>    --     111attendees mailing list
>>>    111attendees@ietf.org <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
>>>    https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees__;!!PtGJab4!uq0kiim5PJv3UJLffZD8FU3J1JN-ggQFFVMP1dsHnMQsi1NxOFNy4fLEn7rnDjoId2nAmi8C$  [ietf.org]
>>>    <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees__;!!PtGJab4!sjf-y7T9JghR5haSK3KeyLFoMmsTQMS1aU2FdCDsKI7MmKriqqXMS2epCo8l1Q83M0Dzcb_z$>
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> 111attendees mailing list
>>> 111attendees@ietf.org
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees__;!!PtGJab4!sjf-y7T9JghR5haSK3KeyLFoMmsTQMS1aU2FdCDsKI7MmKriqqXMS2epCo8l1Q83M0Dzcb_z$ 
> 
> -- 
> 111attendees mailing list
> 111attendees@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees__;!!PtGJab4!uq0kiim5PJv3UJLffZD8FU3J1JN-ggQFFVMP1dsHnMQsi1NxOFNy4fLEn7rnDjoId2nAmi8C$ 