Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 29 March 2010 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5A33A698F for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 03:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y9KlWXwHS2m7 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 03:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9:209:3dff:fe00:7136]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1939F3A6953 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 03:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2TAiIAc027631; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:44:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.101] (p5489BE6C.dip.t-dialin.net [84.137.190.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14EFEF56; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:44:17 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <4BAC239C.4060004@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:44:16 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A6562703-7EF4-4B9E-9E78-AB30F804DD45@tzi.org>
References: <4BA8BCE3.5020309@is.naist.jp> <4BA95B6A.5040707@is.naist.jp><4BAB0464.2010307@is.naist.jp> <4BAB7A4D.7070904@piuha.net> <8133D17D-D9B6-40A6-AE9B-80BF90A5223D@checkpoint.com> <050005AF2D0F493AB38639A33748E8D6@china.huawei.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E24ED320@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4BABD0B2.9050003@piuha.net> <4BABDB19.8060403@gmail.com> <027f01cacc69$4847ae10$d8d70a30$@org> <23E6E51A-5D3B-4F94-B32F-7F3545003E03@cisco.com> <53720E57-D96D-458A-8178-5CC3DB496FAD@nokia.com> <4BAC239C.4060004@gmail.com>
To: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: 77attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:44:02 -0000

On Mar 26, 2010, at 04:01, Scott Brim wrote:

> distinguish between a "hash out ideas"
> session and a "gather support" session.

+1.
Even though that may not actually be the most important distinction.
There are just different kinds of meetings, and some do benefit from a meeting room.

The 6lowapp "bar BOF" in Stockholm worked pretty well in spite of violating Lars' document in a number of ways, because

-- the large number of (active) attendees was indicative of the amount of support
   -- yes, we even had "the equivalent of blue sheets"
-- we had ~ 5 slides to pre-structure the discussion (well, Keynote, not Powerpoint :-)
-- we *had* a discussion, with a tangible result (a five-item structure of the subject)
-- we had a number of ADs there who further shaped the discussion (thank you ** 4)
-- we kept it short (~ 1 h)
-- we had a ~ round table and did not use microphones
-- we had beer :-)

Of course, after that meeting, we had a lot of bar and hallway meetings for the "now let's make all that more precise" phase, too.

Gruesse, Carsten