IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)

Thomas Hardjono <hardjono@MIT.EDU> Tue, 30 March 2010 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=470535745f=hardjono@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6B63A6C72 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.700, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jpBrPgnwW6nX for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-7.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B627E3A6A73 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 12074424-b7b9dae000002832-c8-4bb21fc7722d
Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (MAILHUB-AUTH-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.21.43]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id A6.2E.10290.7CF12BB4; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:59:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-2.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.16]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id o2UFx2AN008227 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:59:02 -0400
Received: from w92exedge3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) ) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id o2UFx0ic026038 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:59:02 -0400
Received: from oc11exhub3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.13) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.393.1; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:58:54 -0400
Received: from EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu ([18.9.4.15]) by oc11exhub3.exchange.mit.edu ([18.9.3.13]) with mapi; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:59:01 -0400
From: Thomas Hardjono <hardjono@MIT.EDU>
To: "77attendees@ietf.org" <77attendees@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:58:58 -0400
Thread-Topic: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
Thread-Index: AcrPTFrfIbqN1lIrTU2S7byeGiNPnwA1MYew
Message-ID: <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD0167972D37@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu>
References: <4BA8BCE3.5020309@is.naist.jp> <4BA95B6A.5040707@is.naist.jp><4BAB0464.2010307@is.naist.jp> <4BAB7A4D.7070904@piuha.net> <8133D17D-D9B6-40A6-AE9B-80BF90A5223D@checkpoint.com> <050005AF2D0F493AB38639A33748E8D6@china.huawei.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E24ED320@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4BABD0B2.9050003@piuha.net> <4BABDB19.8060403@gmail.com> <027f01cacc69$4847ae10$d8d70a30$@org> <23E6E51A-5D3B-4F94-B32F-7F3545003E03@cisco.com> <53720E57-D96D-458A-8178-5CC3DB496FAD@nokia.com> <4BAC239C.4060004@gmail.com> <A6562703-7EF4-4B9E-9E78-AB30F804DD45@tzi.org> <4BB0B975.7040100@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BB0B975.7040100@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:58:34 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 77attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:77attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 10:30 AM
> To: 77attendees@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
> 
> I am actually quite concerned by the number of Bar BoFs.

I agree with Joel -- too many bar bofs obviates/undercuts the purpose of real BOFs.  To me, if a Bar Bof needs projectors and slides, it means that (a) perhaps a mailing list should have been created prior, and (b) perhaps a real BOF would have been better.

Does anyone in the IETF keep track of data regarding the number of Bar Bofs VS number of resulting real BOFs VS number of resulting WGs established?

/thomas/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email