IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Tue, 30 March 2010 06:02 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF293A699C for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.253, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r77HXMmAgtL2 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx06.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8212F3A67C0 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o2U63BGP011300; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:03:20 +0300
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:03:15 +0300
Received: from mgw-sa02.ext.nokia.com ([147.243.1.48]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:03:14 +0300
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.222]) by mgw-sa02.ext.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o2U63DTF009280 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:03:13 +0300
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-5--435990112"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <A6562703-7EF4-4B9E-9E78-AB30F804DD45@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:03:05 +0300
Message-Id: <F167B9B4-C5DB-4261-96E5-BDAD5F9BA316@nokia.com>
References: <4BA8BCE3.5020309@is.naist.jp> <4BA95B6A.5040707@is.naist.jp><4BAB0464.2010307@is.naist.jp> <4BAB7A4D.7070904@piuha.net> <8133D17D-D9B6-40A6-AE9B-80BF90A5223D@checkpoint.com> <050005AF2D0F493AB38639A33748E8D6@china.huawei.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E24ED320@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4BABD0B2.9050003@piuha.net> <4BABDB19.8060403@gmail.com> <027f01cacc69$4847ae10$d8d70a30$@org> <23E6E51A-5D3B-4F94-B32F-7F3545003E03@cisco.com> <53720E57-D96D-458A-8178-5CC3DB496FAD@nokia.com> <4BAC239C.4060004@gmail.com> <A6562703-7EF4-4B9E-9E78-AB30F804DD45@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (mail.fit.nokia.com [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:03:06 +0300 (EEST)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Mar 2010 06:03:14.0147 (UTC) FILETIME=[AF1AEB30:01CACFCE]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>, "77attendees@ietf.org" <77attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:02:58 -0000

Hi,

On 2010-3-29, at 13:44, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> The 6lowapp "bar BOF" in Stockholm worked pretty well in spite of violating Lars' document in a number of ways, because
...

yes, it did. Obviously, sometimes you need to run a larger meeting and for that, some aspects of the IETF process are useful. But it was pretty clear that you had several previous meetings in smaller circles (or maybe an intense email preparation) that made the larger meeting work well.

Lars

PS: Note that I very quickly threw this draft together the draft during the IAB plenary on Thursday, so it's written under the influence of having lived through almost a full IETF week. I'd be happy to work with folks to produce a more balanced/well-rounded -01 rev, if people think this is useful.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email