Re: [77attendees] Bar BoF: ip traceback

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@wonderhamster.org> Thu, 25 March 2010 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2783A67FC for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.239
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.107, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u6-L4jJN3z54 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06F33A6951 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from S73602b (dhcp-wireless-open-a-40-206.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.40.206]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M7qcS-1NhVpL0gwS-00vCvi; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:40:21 -0400
Message-ID: <B9DD5435F7604F14B9CB53B2C6235913@china.huawei.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
References: <4BA8BCE3.5020309@is.naist.jp><4BA95B6A.5040707@is.naist.jp><4BAB0464.2010307@is.naist.jp><4BAB7A4D.7070904@piuha.net><8133D17D-D9B6-40A6-AE9B-80BF90A5223D@checkpoint.com> <050005AF2D0F493AB38639A33748E8D6@china.huawei.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E24ED320@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:40:07 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+R4XqT9ghz+jlW9SI85JeT3KCV8HqCMQZMtqw tIP2EKaL5sF6fnvvgu+LbfgBLaFDnXNADkFE6WO2YqZkCpr0bm Wl3KE8KB73e+2/BsMx+aXtPpkyeti0hWFhiJEqCJIA=
Cc: 77attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Bar BoF: ip traceback
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:40:05 -0000

>> Just for future reference - I don't know where every single person with
>> a
>> dot was, but I know that we had the usual WG chairs activity
>> immediately
>> following the Wednesday plenary, with IESG and IAB invited,
>
> I'll point out that this information isn't widely known.  Without making a 
> statement about whether that is appropriate, organizers of these sorts of 
> meetings cannot be expected to know this.

Hi, Martin,

If all of the Bar BoFs were happening in bars, we'd probably be having a 
different conversation :-)

Thanks,

Spencer