Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)

[Marc Blanchet <[e-mail]>]

I agree with Brian with one exception. I'm pretty against BarBofs 
meetings at the same time as wg meetings. Rooms and setup should not be 
allowed for Barbofs at the same time as wg meetings. Apart from that, it 
is useful to have barbofs/adhoc meetings.

Marc.

Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
> On 2010-03-26 10:08, Jari Arkko wrote:
> ...
>> In any case, I'm not sure its a good trend that our Bar BoFs are
>> becoming more like official meetings, with rooms, presentations, etc.
> 
> Rather to my surprise, I found myself running a barless bar BOF with
> at least 40 people in the room, and we needed microphone discipline,
> both so that everyone could hear and to avoid the discussion fragmenting.
> 
> Clearly, this discussion could never have happened in the bar.
> 
> That's what happens when you announce bar BOFs to 1200 people,
> I guess. But if you don't announce them, and dont't use a decent
> room, some people will feel excluded.
> 
> It's a dilemma. But I'd rather we avoid any rule making, except the
> pragmatic rule that the secretariat needs a nod from an AD before
> allocating a room, since that is a finite and possibly costly
> resource. A bar BOF with rules doesn't seem like the right thing.
> 
>     Brian
> _______________________________________________
> 77attendees mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees


-- 
=========
IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley. http://www.ipv6book.ca
Stun/Turn server for VoIP NAT-FW traversal: http://numb.viagenie.ca
DTN news service: http://reeves.viagenie.ca
NAT64-DNS64 Opensource: http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca