Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)

Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> Tue, 30 March 2010 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAB13A68EE for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.300, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2kbThdhGDpZG for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A14D3A690C for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ice.cs.columbia.edu (ice.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.18.177]) (user=hgs10 mech=PLAIN bits=0) by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2UJTgw3019178 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:29:42 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <0629D27461A32FF9939D6C99@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:29:42 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8BB2D4DE-6DC2-4659-A49F-D2F963073A2A@cs.columbia.edu>
References: <4BA8BCE3.5020309@is.naist.jp> <4BA95B6A.5040707@is.naist.jp> <4BAB0464.2010307@is.naist.jp> <4BAB7A4D.7070904@piuha.net> <8133D17D-D9B6-40A6-AE9B-80BF90A5223D@checkpoint.com> <050005AF2D0F493AB38639A33748E8D6@china.huawei.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E24ED320@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4BABD0B2.9050003@piuha.net> <4BABDB19.8060403@gmail.com> <027f01cacc69$4847ae10$d8d70a30$@org> <23E6E51A-5D3B-4F94-B32F-7F3545003E03@cisco.com> <53720E57-D96D-458A-8178-5CC3DB496FAD@nokia.com> <4BAC239C.4060004@gmail.com> <A6562703-7EF4-4B9E-9E78-AB30F804DD45@tzi.org> <4BB0B975.7040100@joelhalpern.com> <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD0167972D37@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu> <m2k4stbq9g.wl%randy@psg.com> <4BB24841.2080109@cisco.com> <4765_1269975881_o2UJ4eSW020356_m2hbnxbph8.wl%randy@psg.com> <0629D27461A32FF9939D6C99@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu>
To: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-No-Spam-Score: Local
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:29:15 -0000

BOFs have now often become the equivalent of Senate committee hearings: they are staged for the benefit of the senators (ADs and the IAB attendees), to convince them that there's a group of mature adults in the room who can get work done. (Or, conversely, for opponents of the effort to create doubts about the maturity.) It has become relatively rare for the BOF to do technical work - the emphasis is more process-oriented, focusing on charters. Thus, we naturally are looking for an outlet that is less of a project review/audition and more technical, with barBOFs filling that role. It is not clear that this division is all that productive, given the cycle time issues.

Henning