IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Tue, 30 March 2010 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386C43A68ED for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xVkF4rfVRTdX for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726583A6837 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so887331qwb.31 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VTO1644t+dcqgKdm8pixltYVR4grVxi+vTGONHEGTEM=; b=XKWzDWvXG/6517FytyGar8EpCH3pbjaCf2JgDSpWxA7zvnk+RPW+8tGB3Z0o3mn0gr LB84M9uC0zwX7YtKCzHuuhpfbcvP9cLgxg28utc5rfzc+YpvAbwLcMEc/GUm07reELEg ovSm/ur6/ZK1kknZRwUDvmJ5sj204UvrMdOTg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=fuJ903I3MnK4SV7LEUV5w2AfTE/Tje5Qp+h/cvjc/hwd449KNF0Xr1kIhFCiBDWEi+ DpKLcztUEpYQfhScWf9yc5hWWPNEb6YF37L5tasoDG1FtlMq/VZEx3IYhXBQdRCNxvFY RFrucsP/shgYHjPvCdHacudCwAqhnJ17GSG+I=
Received: by 10.229.222.205 with SMTP id ih13mr3150727qcb.73.1269977414483; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbrim-mbp.local (198-135-0-233.cisco.com [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm4334506qwh.25.2010.03.30.12.30.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BB25142.20904@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:30:10 -0400
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
References: <4BA8BCE3.5020309@is.naist.jp> <4BA95B6A.5040707@is.naist.jp> <4BAB0464.2010307@is.naist.jp> <4BAB7A4D.7070904@piuha.net> <8133D17D-D9B6-40A6-AE9B-80BF90A5223D@checkpoint.com> <050005AF2D0F493AB38639A33748E8D6@china.huawei.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E24ED320@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4BABD0B2.9050003@piuha.net> <4BABDB19.8060403@gmail.com> <027f01cacc69$4847ae10$d8d70a30$@org> <23E6E51A-5D3B-4F94-B32F-7F3545003E03@cisco.com> <53720E57-D96D-458A-8178-5CC3DB496FAD@nokia.com> <4BAC239C.4060004@gmail.com> <A6562703-7EF4-4B9E-9E78-AB30F804DD45@tzi.org> <4BB0B975.7040100@joelhalpern.com> <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD0167972D37@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu> <m2k4stbq9g.wl%randy@psg.com> <4BB24841.2080109@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BB24841.2080109@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Thomas Hardjono <hardjono@MIT.EDU>, "77attendees@ietf.org" <77attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:29:48 -0000

Eliot Lear allegedly wrote on 03/30/2010 14:51 EDT:
> I think there's some truth to this.  My recollection, and Randy can
> correct this if I'm wrong, was that the bar was set relatively high for
> an official BoF as space during the day difficult to find, requiring
> careful balancing of interests.  

The threashold for a real BOF might not be too high considering how
important they are in the IETF, but people find it intimidating to
figure out how to do what they need to do, and seek other paths with
less resistance.

(Personally I don't mind at all that bar BOFs aren't near bars.)

swb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email