Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@wonderhamster.org> Thu, 25 March 2010 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA7B3A6928 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.235
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.104, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JOHHcY15SXnR for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C533A6803 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from S73602b (dhcp-wireless-open-a-40-206.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.40.206]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M92yD-1NkltG3wxJ-00CRS7; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:47:04 -0400
Message-ID: <2A5966FC68514C50886ED0FE6EFF2D36@china.huawei.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
References: <4BA8BCE3.5020309@is.naist.jp> <4BA95B6A.5040707@is.naist.jp><4BAB0464.2010307@is.naist.jp> <4BAB7A4D.7070904@piuha.net> <8133D17D-D9B6-40A6-AE9B-80BF90A5223D@checkpoint.com> <050005AF2D0F493AB38639A33748E8D6@china.huawei.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E24ED320@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4BABD0B2.9050003@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:46:48 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18RQdFHQRbt3Plr40himjXV2GpS+O2OgSTlFBz golC3jYVw4FKKktaNKPY9qAU5BBg65asd0f5GCbeEcznHo+dn3 WdzLLOXRBaUYVEtCyfwVvXHSw5uTT8rKdqIE3+k71k=
Cc: 77attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:46:53 -0000

Martin,

I know that what Jari is saying, is true, and has been for a while. I 
remember when I was still chair of PILC (which closed in something like 
2002), and Vern Paxson (TSV AD) was scheduling his entire week in 15-minute 
blocks.

Spencer


> Martin, Spencer,
>
>> I'll point out that this information isn't widely known.  Without making 
>> a statement about whether that is appropriate, organizers of these sorts 
>> of meetings cannot be expected to know this.
>>
>
> I understand this problem. However, I'll point out that for many active WG 
> chairs/editors and in particular IESG and IAB members the week is pretty 
> packed. Publication of additional information about side meetings may not 
> help, if there simply isn't other time to move sessions to. Just as a data 
> point, yesterday for lunch slot I had two things that I wanted to be at in 
> addition to the traceback Bar BoF. For the after-plenary slot, I had two 
> overlapping Bar BoFs and a directorate dinner.