Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)

<joel.jaeggli@nokia.com> Tue, 30 March 2010 21:26 UTC

Return-Path: <joel.jaeggli@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6583A6B39 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.754
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.754 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.715, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pqm4kovc1xyQ for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx06.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB233A6A6B for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh106.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.213]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o2ULQQ12001284; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:26:37 +0300
Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.30]) by esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:25:43 +0300
Received: from vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.22]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:25:38 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.8]) by vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:25:33 +0300
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-04.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.89]) by nok-am1mhub-04.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.8]) with mapi; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:25:33 +0200
From: joel.jaeggli@nokia.com
To: spencer@wonderhamster.org, brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com, scott.brim@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:25:29 +0200
Thread-Topic: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
Thread-Index: AcrQTPSyUBO02PPHQHmIp1hNfj2WVwAAhhJw
Message-ID: <FE14C16A26F361409AB2A1D6DAA3590658662DA19E@NOK-EUMSG-04.mgdnok.nokia.com>
References: <4BA8BCE3.5020309@is.naist.jp> <4BA95B6A.5040707@is.naist.jp> <4BAB0464.2010307@is.naist.jp> <4BAB7A4D.7070904@piuha.net> <8133D17D-D9B6-40A6-AE9B-80BF90A5223D@checkpoint.com> <050005AF2D0F493AB38639A33748E8D6@china.huawei.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E24ED320@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4BABD0B2.9050003@piuha.net> <4BABDB19.8060403@gmail.com> <027f01cacc69$4847ae10$d8d70a30$@org> <23E6E51A-5D3B-4F94-B32F-7F3545003E03@cisco.com> <53720E57-D96D-458A-8178-5CC3DB496FAD@nokia.com> <4BAC239C.4060004@gmail.com> <A6562703-7EF4-4B9E-9E78-AB30F804DD45@tzi.org> <4BB0B975.7040100@joelhalpern.com> <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD0167972D37@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu> <m2k4stbq9g.wl%randy@psg.com> <4BB24841.2080109@cisco.com><4BB25142.20904@gmail.com> <4BB26010.9090405@gmail.com> <9F83906D9C974422A011C080279A50DC@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <9F83906D9C974422A011C080279A50DC@china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Mar 2010 21:25:33.0970 (UTC) FILETIME=[8835C720:01CAD04F]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: hardjono@MIT.EDU, 77attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:26:13 -0000

> Maybe this is something to think about, in site surveys? 
> We've been in hotels where there was no open sitting space 
> except for the lobby, and we've been in hotels that did have 
> that kind of sitting space.

The availability and usability of casual space is very much a part of site surveys. It is however one consideration among many as you might imagine.