Re: [77attendees] terminal room

David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> Tue, 30 March 2010 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dwm@xpasc.com>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CC03A6A21 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.346
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.346 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.877, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ytjvIzgJsNe8 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.xpasc.com (mail.xpasc.com [68.164.244.189]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D7C3A6B05 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bslepgate.xpasc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bslepgate.xpasc.com (Postfix-out) with ESMTP id A606C101837 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Propel-Return-Path: <dwm@xpasc.com>
Received: from mail.xpasc.com ([10.1.2.88]) by [127.0.0.1] ([127.0.0.1]) (port 7027) (Abaca EPG outproxy filter 3.1.1.9347 $Rev: 9262 $) id iz6Ura3ul8V0; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:08:57 -0700
Received: from xpasc.com (egate.xpasc.com [10.1.2.49]) by bslepgate.xpasc.com (Postfix-out) with ESMTP id 8D019101835 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from egate.xpasc.com (egate.xpasc.com [10.1.2.49]) by xpasc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2UL8u4x021891 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:08:56 -0700
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:08:56 -0700
From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
To: 77attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4BB26375.8000000@att.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1003301405310.14218@egate.xpasc.com>
References: <4BA8BCE3.5020309@is.naist.jp> <4BA95B6A.5040707@is.naist.jp> <4BAB0464.2010307@is.naist.jp> <4BAB7A4D.7070904@piuha.net> <8133D17D-D9B6-40A6-AE9B-80BF90A5223D@checkpoint.com> <050005AF2D0F493AB38639A33748E8D6@china.huawei.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E24ED320@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4BABD0B2.9050003@piuha.net> <4BABDB19.8060403@gmail.com> <027f01cacc69$4847ae10$d8d70a30$@org> <23E6E51A-5D3B-4F94-B32F-7F3545003E03@cisco.com> <53720E57-D96D-458A-8178-5CC3DB496FAD@nokia.com> <4BAC239C.4060004@gmail.com> <A6562703-7EF4-4B9E-9E78-AB30F804DD45@tzi.org> <4BB0B975.7040100@joelhalpern.com> <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD0167972D37@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu> <m2k4stbq9g.wl%randy@psg.com> <4BB24841.2080109@cisco.com> <m2hbnxbph8.wl%randy@psg.com> <4BB26375.8000000@att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Propel-ID: iz6Ura3ul8V0
Subject: Re: [77attendees] terminal room
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: 77attendees@ietf.org
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:08:31 -0000

Having a room with adequate open tables is a real plus. I've been to other
confences with excellant wired access but insufficient space for just
doing some work with power, printer access, someone there to help with
connectivity issues.

Sure the name could change, but why bother. Everyone knows this just
the BYOT area now, but in the end still a terminal room.

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Tony Hansen wrote:

> The name of the terminal room is clearly historic. Nowadays, it clearly
> doesn't provide that. But what it does provide is the trio of wired access,
> power strips and printers. If these are provided in another area with similar
> access and facilities, that would be fine with me.
> 
>     Tony
> 
> On 3/30/2010 3:04 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > ps: and nanog does not have a terminal room.  when is the last time you
> > saw a terminal anyway?  at ietf it looks like a work-place that could be
> > done in a a manner less like a cable/table dungeon.  e.g. one break-out
> > could have a printer.