IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 25 March 2010 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92ED93A6AF4 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.528
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.941, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYLSr8lxmcrd for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f196.google.com (mail-qy0-f196.google.com [209.85.221.196]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE443A68CB for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so3098543qyk.22 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xyn4ngtJKPLcPFoV1KDZyY1b5jIDvpPYEpN60iUXWRo=; b=lZ3iPVkR+k0LM5lsaWkdX2vmz4UQo3FfcBI7z6zP07D6j1XzZzHIDTq9KTIg513QM/ USgbdLUk0KuSQkWJyFMrFm8AOQXfAknf6UKs1014pB7Bx6iWIS4CvVUOqiL+56MCuH3X 0CdOPy41ZZYNzPssd2+T6crWXhQMfJ9sYBvGM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=g73M9xB6B+sdv4UwhEe+5ucLvbJa8cZ0RUMgsHq0pT/t/bVVkvgqt+22MyDWtM2xZ/ 2sYkcqnqQ8AgmTxiFbpyRPzLCsb52iCpCub03Z5nJIVVp/eSTyyDv/Ib+yJAHzLtIBVA dF/vuzi52rqWzLf4ydLzMT5gR9Bbvzo5mb9P0=
Received: by 10.229.97.147 with SMTP id l19mr1415980qcn.24.1269555953776; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.27.105] (dhcp-wireless-open-abg-27-105.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.27.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm154193qyk.4.2010.03.25.15.25.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BABE2EC.8040708@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:25:48 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
References: <4BA8BCE3.5020309@is.naist.jp> <4BA95B6A.5040707@is.naist.jp><4BAB0464.2010307@is.naist.jp> <4BAB7A4D.7070904@piuha.net> <8133D17D-D9B6-40A6-AE9B-80BF90A5223D@checkpoint.com> <050005AF2D0F493AB38639A33748E8D6@china.huawei.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E24ED320@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4BABD0B2.9050003@piuha.net> <4BABDB19.8060403@gmail.com> <4BABDDF8.3070900@viagenie.ca> <8D54B300-6288-4199-9058-316E6BF85ABC@cybernothing.org>
In-Reply-To: <8D54B300-6288-4199-9058-316E6BF85ABC@cybernothing.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 77attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:25:35 -0000

On 2010-03-26 11:08, J.D. Falk wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> 
>> I agree with Brian with one exception. I'm pretty against BarBofs meetings at the same time as wg meetings. Rooms and setup should not be allowed for Barbofs at the same time as wg meetings. Apart from that, it is useful to have barbofs/adhoc meetings.
> 
> +1

-0.75

I understand the reason for that, but sometimes the nucleus of people for
a bar BOF have closely related interests and find a slot when they are
all free of WG sessions. The surprise for my bar BOF was that having
selected a slot which suited the nucleus of half a dozen people, >30
others decided to skip IETF sessions too. I wouldn't want a rule about
this either.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email