IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Concerns about Singapore

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 10 April 2016 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D92C12D51A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V_9hLXFW4Bhf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EDF212B035 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id t10so184253689ywa.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=3StXW43i848qq4hvj6l72CYuNdWEpkh+ZWwic5hDG/Y=; b=naYjldRdZWpO0nwJTHuxnuBDkACn2jKoSYsS/hOO2KG0bRhBW+rec+upmLWXtk4/T3 Xwlvr7/05tKmKc8ltK4KRZ5hOYuy28tdTLLpLFtQ7/ws4HRWQfGNwkEYBmLM0nfy7UUr /9ptwXFLTh3P7q5/WwbyUSgYNgm0qqB7G4Qg2CSmde7VIbywb91ycqVcsGNilVzjx7fv A6ROyOBKJDg7khBhDcHHgUpAapwsVsXomnRg8ww85gXpIGrg2RFXN4WiBxkEoE/ZYtYu Jif3w/mAdsIVmwDdvysaAmDtMBUUQ86vq/Q90419z2GzYE8ORLmMVSSAT354Fhwjx3iJ 7w7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=3StXW43i848qq4hvj6l72CYuNdWEpkh+ZWwic5hDG/Y=; b=B4HYl31MZdqpvXXELUOoIxNw6uNVvS1uPkS+mEwlETHH8DBFJBTrGhVECYJXOg/Udn ZYLOMmJ4OVlDvWItwzcYVY8C+wGUrycr2vr6HVQWDwRd30Ht0nhrDCPk7Kv9tU5dJmOw TikNPUfriRgcj7Sa88GtljwSv8f/um05DuJ4berni4wCc5JPu4VJrFqp8gvGG6d1X/7j MCd6km/1jTlNgk6feIgxSFdWFXRGiYk4IlK5uHF87eujNpf8Sqizgj4V9YhtKhDr4znr RUxpDL7hiw/VgAFlMSF29MFSsuDFQ124szX4tRtWNjx99M6Yc8mw0JzDtYZwdgu89kc7 k8vQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLI1oPQQwsYcNN2cCcdi4z6alTcPYe9pGFoPUbQwatzPsReNW3/NmxzWqJJnL2b/lf9By5e2COTxst5Lg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.94.9 with SMTP id s9mr9177919ywb.307.1460306595398; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.207.211 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.207.211 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BE6114E3-5CFA-4416-8C36-DB05B0239F18@me.com>
References: <0D914666-C3D4-4CCE-AD5E-4E5B34EA1A73@piuha.net> <20160407182936.GA21340@pfrc.org> <CAB75xn780nNDjGa_Cc222J20-+1CCHt09Xp8KHzaK=n0xx51pg@mail.gmail.com> <5706B100.9040509@mnt.se> <CAB75xn6fmj84ROUtG5eUB3GerHx83hrEr3w5vSADY_g=BRg5FA@mail.gmail.com> <9B723FB0-6B93-4C85-ADD9-D423F873CF08@virtualized.org> <20160409155300.6283348.41255.10529@blackberry.com> <ADC8666A-436C-4AD4-BD48-9277601069F8@gmail.com> <20160410063603.6283348.44889.10575@blackberry.com> <CAKKJt-cjYe-FgRW9n-Ve7KWPq2ALYUDwQb=nuAHONQFpbGb8Fw@mail.gmail.com> <BE6114E3-5CFA-4416-8C36-DB05B0239F18@me.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:43:15 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-fT_A8Nz_=cg=1F6W74qP+96zV4+3GABEU80Pi_CiS7aA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11491bbae1cfc20530241fcd"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0zDtO_JSRhDJmNGkpMhK7vlbzmI>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:43:18 -0000

Hi, Ole,

On Apr 10, 2016 10:08, "Ole Jacobsen" <olejacobsen@me.com> wrote:
>
> Please rest assured that we are gathering information on precisely these
issues!

Oh, I am. I absolutely am.

And happy birthday, I believe?

Spencer

> Ole J. Jacobsen
> Editor & Publisher
> The Internet Protocol Journal
> Cell: +1 415 370-4628
> docomo: (090) 3337 9311
> http://protocoljournal.org
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 10, 2016, at 12:01, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This has been a wide-ranging conversation that I've been content to
watch quietly, but Andrew just stepped on the land mine ...
>>
>> On Apr 10, 2016 01:36, "Andrew Allen" <aallen@blackberry.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > That's why I proposed that IETF check with the hotels that this isn't
going to be an issue. The other potential issue I foresee which needs
checking with the authorities is if there will be a problem with customs
and immigration forms with questions regarding marital status and number of
family members traveling with you.
>>
>> Bingo.
>>
>> I've been coming to the IETF since 1996, and I know a fair number of
GLBTQ IETF participants, but I knew most of them for years, and in a few
cases for more than a decade, before realizing that.
>>
>> For my GLBTQ friends from the US, it has been relatively recent for most
of them to live their lives openly.
>>
>> The gay man who automatically came to IETF meetings even ten years ago
with no "paper trail" ten years ago is now much more likely to show up with
a paper train now.
>>
>> If he shows up with another man with the same last name, the same
address on IDs, each other as emergency contacts on every form that asks
for that, and (for extra credit) one or more kids with the same last name
in tow, it's a lot harder to miss in 2016 than it was in 2006, and at least
some of that is still visible even if he leaves the family at home.
>>
>> Our friends who were forced to suffer in silence until recently would
have a much more difficult time doing that today, even if they wanted to.
>>
>> Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email