Re: [102attendees] [103attendees] Visa problems - need a different invitation letter

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 05 September 2018 01:26 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 102attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 102attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523F1130DE5; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 18:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z743jMQROjnS; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 18:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA349128CFD; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 18:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id f38-v6so4735608edd.8; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 18:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=/I6GsEf8jK7M7uK0lX3UfQJVR+aq2nDlG64za+OhRpY=; b=fYZ2fBbfYBdbr5uFuC0R9pCq9l74SnSjimElLZ/sDM0qrZVaaYQD1PhoBaz/73w4R7 YAZ1XFvm0y/7sPdHrdWz/gJ1CX+tN6NF46qschqX7uSe11COejr6gzWvT2CP8JZn3tNj CSGuShpEmsFcdWSyltFg5HA8s82mKWATlA6bkbpKb127IOn1Da3UAD/mFUzIWqoOQZ5L l61SOsDMKPBTKMahXD0dQ80qxqw9z8ySPeNzecK3JNK8mOkcCBdW2hiereGpD0bQz5+n ujUs3udeq+cmyMA3OzoTHRK9laZIuS+GX3VIgx57aukLyN/u2VLKblVkiFMvAAYlQBOm RRzA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=/I6GsEf8jK7M7uK0lX3UfQJVR+aq2nDlG64za+OhRpY=; b=sBb25TCDvZoNwoELvSccaHeq3zsVze2Ylv/gO5c93EUwVp1QVGMU2jGbbqGBSkU+01 EZLtJvvKmSbmmgz/or8r6nmqwXDVxEb86eJT3eoMnEZ8JFAc+wRbTh3lKgtA+UFbQ9WO szEN/HhpDT5h88qYxS+jxPXGnJw+uaWfC++8fHil4gt9mhiGxVmM9GyYB2P3z5am+PKN k2AgRm4sr/eX0SL5WkCgl9Z1/kPAyd1CEQnvlhmCh716/uX+Ex+x0REBIOO/RBQj7OW6 XP6Xb1rkuOxYqb7ry8kyCUBAtodHUfw7QzKkYevnPDLy9Cvicm7vq1cR0rubC1MGe5rf I1og==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51A0H6CvTX53CIow8nD2GGIMTFNI76a2a3WccecBXwdxTXshN8HH vpvIAm+P2DDtlAb/wfdz234=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdY9ToqI1Q6h0LmIObq6AUIng1HlUFODJLsJX2rpefftUsWDllgvd8NGqBGJVBrHqY43fNnEIg==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:9421:: with SMTP id p30-v6mr39546589eda.150.1536110810230; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 18:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:1546::1065? ([2600:8802:5600:1546::1065]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a19-v6sm426845edd.69.2018.09.04.18.26.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Sep 2018 18:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <C7E98AD2-9E6D-4003-B536-E68C3F8E6A3B@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_18D7E4DE-9929-4A5F-9331-F923EB396911"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 18:26:44 -0700
In-Reply-To: <68380FA4-E91D-4AD0-95B0-5C64F6258ADF@redfish-solutions.com>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, 102attendees <102attendees@ietf.org>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, 103attendees@ietf.org, Niel Harper <harper@isoc.org>, Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
References: <A8143A75C4D32848AB4E59FFC8B8FBA84BD19247@SINEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1808291846180.5588@ole-pro-2.local> <163e477e-956b-c388-a062-115ad64629c2@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1808291954390.5588@ole-pro-2.local> <1762761125.28180.1535604751601@ichabod.co-bxl> <0DCD267A-8333-41D2-875B-F68051789BB8@gmail.com> <1725ef85-0763-85ca-7e31-bd251e4b4bac@ericsson.com> <20180904131753.wcqvts3d6nuyf56s@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <F5C76E02-3918-4525-9F5E-6EF95287D677@isoc.org> <C43F0F29-DB56-4723-976E-442177384EEC@nostrum.com> <AD352F893CC34984364088EE@PSB> <B4AF322B-DA08-4AC4-BFF3-7D19DDA80FB4@tzi.org> <68380FA4-E91D-4AD0-95B0-5C64F6258ADF@redfish-solutions.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/102attendees/4K_8CzHB67370Okt2GjKa085dS8>
Subject: Re: [102attendees] [103attendees] Visa problems - need a different invitation letter
X-BeenThere: 102attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 102 attendees that have opted in on this list <102attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/102attendees>, <mailto:102attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/102attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:102attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:102attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/102attendees>, <mailto:102attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 01:26:54 -0000

Well, and the US has issues in that respect. That said, Carsten is correct that a vanishingly small percentage of our police force seems to be xenophobic, and that vanishingly small percentage seems to dominate the papers.

> On Sep 4, 2018, at 1:32 PM, Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> That’s a bit of an apples to oranges comparison.
> 
> I think as North Americans (Canadians and Americans) and Western Europeans, we’re used to the rule of law and the equal application of it.
> 
> Not always the case in less developed countries.
> 
> I think that’s part of John’s point.
> 
> 
>> On Sep 4, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>> 
>> John,
>> 
>> While all this is true, it is also not very useful. The equivalent advice for US visitors would be that you can be shot every moment by a police officer that got a bit agitated. That is not useful advice. Useful advice would be how not to get into situations with those dangerous people. While some legal advice can be useful here, this is mostly about being street-smart. It is hard to be this without some experience, and this is why the only useful posts here have been on previous experience.
>> 
>> Sent from mobile
>> 
>> On 4. Sep 2018, at 19:07, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi.
>>> 
>>> If only to keep mailing list traffic down, can I encourage
>>> everyone who is speculating on what type of visa is needed to
>>> find the note that Andrew Sullivan posted on the subject a few
>>> weeks ago and reread it carefully.
>>> 
>>> WIth a very small number of exceptions, the final decision about
>>> what category of visa is, or is not, required belongs to the
>>> authorities at the border when you try to enter the country.  If
>>> you appear with a tourist visa or waiver and they ask questions
>>> and conclude that category is inappropriate, you are either
>>> headed home or in for a long conversation (and maybe an exercise
>>> in filling out forms) while your status is sorted out.  If you
>>> have a letter from you local consulate or a copy of their web
>>> page indicating that your choice was consistent with their
>>> guidance, the actual border authorities might accept that as
>>> evidence that you should get in on that category of visa, might
>>> accept it as evidence that whatever decision you made was made
>>> in good faith, or might ignore it entirely.
>>> 
>>> Again, Andrew's summary and comments are much better than mine.
>>> But my point is that these decision belong to border authorities
>>> in the country you are trying to enter and we really cannot
>>> accomplish very much (other that causing noise on the lists) by
>>> crowdsourcing opinions about what is needed or appropriate.
>>> This is one area in which IETF Consensus, even if it existed,
>>> would be of little value.
>>> 
>>> best,
>>>    john
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 102attendees mailing list
>>> 102attendees@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/102attendees
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 102attendees mailing list
>> 102attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/102attendees
> 
> 
> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that there is a highway to hell and a stairway to heaven is an interesting comment on projected traffic volume...