IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [102attendees] Visa problems - need a different invitation letter

Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Thu, 06 September 2018 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 102attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 102attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19263130E92; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 08:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9WBC1a1VaVe; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 08:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-xc36.google.com (mail-yw1-xc36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BA4B130E1A; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 08:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-xc36.google.com with SMTP id x67-v6so4225761ywg.0; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 08:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xEs8oeOUvzN8jn0yy2msRuf9HyLz66PDld/NFvjHDp4=; b=GfPNqE2/cy2nPqroTjlE3+nUd18urnSEm2vu4P2WIQOiLgWRO9s+pOarRpO2hV5BQJ bKbKmWZKLXX0kgmjIi5tEt16TC8aB7vmpQS49U95Co5OaS4C44NTV3okBfmK+mwr/Fqs d/e53/hzXunlKEHZZtAt8N7ahr6lY+b+rIid1UP+chIo7AzBeORJKUc7HSnk1pdfBBoU E+uRa77qTedz9bW12q6igNeo4FtlemvDmtK/86tw/l3fIiKwfjRMtBBS2kiH+xiCRv/Y VHb26tzH2wQXMFg4rTZ+1jYXuhkEko0GMf3SmofCpxcTOGjlnxVwxQLXZeP9l/XVrE82 zzPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xEs8oeOUvzN8jn0yy2msRuf9HyLz66PDld/NFvjHDp4=; b=UnPMPdZg2skPmDjcsg/R2Hl0LsIzT3Q62OmtfwGmIuLvR05+W2L8THD5RFgfG3ziJS sRj54SchvM3ZvPGZJvEdC2nD9frYbsJjAxfkqsGXdlEuuAJ4fwLduEMMgEgmUubXqqU8 vI/TQfpf6x9dVtSOf6gRpik/wYNH0dF0WD0eqVZwvhHGOg97H3S54wQofuGVFICbgtTW inT3zbbS7Nt4hALfI7YO9celH2Dh1dzcs9lJv8MEffyrsehZx5ZWNb9sQIFkk73mAuQq JzxhbcQTlr3eVF0MhfYYGWl/Z+Qj1Yl/IGk4k77gRX72HI8KBA3/46HUWZkOa6DtRw4M SMdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DQvWtw1x01V6VyhBSIMhmQrHsgRtM/6nPty5IzGocI0Hpwh+W0 2vFLY3lYSDPCQUDpQgT2GHlrlmpGV9NU99ZfiG13mxGO
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYS3CBCD39dCyd/dQX9hZj0e4WZoNG2upCGIFXj5UZ9EY/FqI+YNNActumwzujUSzHhHQQHicdPKuNwL06SJl8=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:a115:: with SMTP id y21-v6mr1777240ywg.178.1536247643138; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 08:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A8143A75C4D32848AB4E59FFC8B8FBA84BD19247@SINEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1808291846180.5588@ole-pro-2.local> <163e477e-956b-c388-a062-115ad64629c2@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1808291954390.5588@ole-pro-2.local> <1762761125.28180.1535604751601@ichabod.co-bxl> <0DCD267A-8333-41D2-875B-F68051789BB8@gmail.com> <1725ef85-0763-85ca-7e31-bd251e4b4bac@ericsson.com> <CALZ3u+b+pXAZ1yvfGDLsgCH1d_E9yZN7TQfoF-wn2jkPvC_f5g@mail.gmail.com> <F89A9948-1C34-4FF2-9C58-D4228736314D@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <F89A9948-1C34-4FF2-9C58-D4228736314D@rfc1035.com>
From: Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 23:27:08 +0800
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+ZKiJuxOB6i9HkyVn-UqAsqby85BV9r0tQqkZ+fH2JOAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Cc: 102attendees <102attendees@ietf.org>, 103attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000e6ede057535873c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/102attendees/6bOibFZWubNkhbprWlb_OradWqI>
Subject: Re: [102attendees] Visa problems - need a different invitation letter
X-BeenThere: 102attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 102 attendees that have opted in on this list <102attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/102attendees>, <mailto:102attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/102attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:102attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:102attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/102attendees>, <mailto:102attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 15:27:26 -0000

"Further discussion on this topic/thread is just pointless noise"

Sorry, it's not. There's already a lot of valuable information in this
thread regarding actual visa processing cases, and more is to come.

чт, 6 сент. 2018 г., 23:15 Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>:

> On 6 Sep 2018, at 16:01, Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is it an overly optimistic idea to bring someone from the host to the
> thread and ask them for advice?
>
> Yes. It’s utterly impractical to expect anyone to provide advice on visa
> issues which will or won’t apply to everyone going to an IETF meeting. See
> the earlier comments by Andrew Sullivan and John Klensin. Everybody has to
> make their own decisions about this and get definitive advice specific to
> their individual circumstances from the relevant embassy/consulate. It’s
> that simple.
>
> Further discussion on this topic/thread is just pointless noise. It’s time
> to shut it down.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email