Re: [Add] fixing coffee shop brokenness with DoH

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 25 July 2019 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D975F120240 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FEXk3Ijn3q3h for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FC1C1202FE for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id b29so27617373lfq.1 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eCUa55pSohz8Km1CTdiu/uLpzpGlXJRqF3uqe1ZbGLU=; b=BQsdoQXOXLjLdzz6BEYmh0ciyfcdADC2aW3eV3s25PuAe8rn4dcSpwq4Htj0A987vB xjDdzS8CarevAicdX+D47QKAb9A6asX4I0N953Qokm6R2Ih3L8hvARuPgQVQTHzXtyVQ FZgsblfABn2VG6/lixjaXXBzXexKIdqSenypRxmirdkMAX2UK9OdxFDkGagVDz2KiVr6 QJMb94hP01VB2R8asfGkCRDqoxW6eJ2vSRtlzhoYlUNssBtITssvBwBdEs2Nz+7rSgg1 TidjwzyVAtRiltpvAJuX6CgUhnNkLKiquTCrweNFFQTBYikimHPABkfWZbvZiKSOr85z IcOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eCUa55pSohz8Km1CTdiu/uLpzpGlXJRqF3uqe1ZbGLU=; b=KfybNrZMR7QtlZU/IoQSWZXAN5hltZsGGQFe5HrZlzs/dT0lOP45KJhbR7ymVOJK5K XvwvIO0mt+aFkOmY/8QCPxDU2mUi/5At4etQVtB1cyGf7RrOI5+qothQrck1boyrbXSQ Awcnb6qssI0K0ZSAnfhAm9tEpwcLwlpLU7GHbkhp4RTEhIx2p78UfqSS38vXYmN4NTFC tXnyHAC/XReT39TKvM8zLu1ME1LQzJvDwwl2Dp2f0McmsUSmlQ3EET6ASvKRnqYH6lMg 6jrwP/VmmRK6wNVnVw6HZtlC6abe0lZvXHJf8A5HEUmfn3AHaE1rtSdTWrv7U87mmh6B PNtg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWDj6F9U6TCbE29BSvyOYBUVgqn9BYzKysAubTPAuucoigdapxP 8FOkMXYva7JrTp/KtWjFzRTceNoUCl5Tvl06qFGoEA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwAYMV9GZmG5S1O45RyJenQ54NgACVIwjWdJpVSTsE+k1sCfH46wdt1ubH3E9IXKP6NYSFsitSdpxZ7BbVr+7I=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:51a3:: with SMTP id f3mr13710117lfk.94.1564069263443; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6Sx9TEt6CMzRRrdb-HwT_k987oW=4yF1FCbDF17zkaE2Vg@mail.gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E23910C@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <14DF8769-A817-4C06-9140-80198518244F@akamai.com> <CAChr6SzH1EycAr5n+dK5BQcG=0Zsw66qE=8Rptvq7SEoEvQQ=Q@mail.gmail.com> <E5A0DAE2-A718-41EA-B490-58ABD0F31CF2@rfc1035.com> <CABcZeBMqvZivS_Hk_2mSOAOnM+mHy1mtcwnHVFc14v_jdkgU=Q@mail.gmail.com> <1EFB37A3-23C6-44FF-B001-8F04B381EC04@rfc1035.com> <CABcZeBPB2Bb8RCigDt+tJ5Lz3KQQnPAVVkrF+fDUiTFJcw=eVw@mail.gmail.com> <D3359CC8-80B4-4443-B3B1-F2AD80C94DA6@rfc1035.com> <CABcZeBOZiu_=VfWJDY_9V86TiGpsuZRKMCiersopxD+kTBBUtA@mail.gmail.com> <20190725142135.0FFA715BD17B@fafnir.remote.dragon.net> <CABcZeBPO-hi=z-fB1toOCBRTUF+krndCZqPHS=Jrev1tTtY6XQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCir9L+U7cUWJgOLdP-G1MtxWvPo5sUn4z9GRvym12buH2A@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBN1SrXFopZ4XVZjONQ=heqr7XE_s9XQWUv3ctYny3Xu1g@mail.gmail.com> <LO2P265MB1327A47EE98888D755633C66C2C10@LO2P265MB1327.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <LO2P265MB1327A47EE98888D755633C66C2C10@LO2P265MB1327.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:40:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBP7O8KFYCm7=N1ceY7E+=2a55vcAgVUf+Mp7Nd2nFzvBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Campling <andrew.campling@419.consulting>
Cc: "add@ietf.org" <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000da142c058e8340d3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/aCs0JEZjYusPHFvMbUTECIXpw8E>
Subject: Re: [Add] fixing coffee shop brokenness with DoH
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:41:08 -0000

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 8:39 AM Andrew Campling
<andrew.campling@419.consulting> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 4:21 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm..com
> <ekr@rtfm.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> > This thread has gotten quite long and hard to track. I was talking about
> the case where DoH was not present, and my point was that DNSSEC is not a
> replacement for DoH in the settings I am concerned with.
>
>
>
> > I agree that DoH potentially makes end-user software DNSSEC validation
> viable, and that's something that at some point we might look at.
>
>
>
>
>
> Presumably this applies do both DoT and DoH Eric?
>

Yes.

-Ekr


>
> As someone said during the DoH discussion at the ICANN conference in
> Marrakesh last month, “DoT and DoH give you a hardened pipe, don’t stop you
> drawing poisoned water from the lake; DNSSEC reassures you that the water
> is safe” (or something very close to that).  I thought that was a useful
> analogy to highlight why the combination of DoT/H and DNSSEC was
> beneficial.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Andrew*
>