IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-related WG

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Tue, 16 February 2021 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F333A0C6A for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:16:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGgZetVeqyZX for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34DA73A11F2 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:15:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDB3D63403F; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:15:19 -0600 (CST)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rzeBG5phtowE; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:15:18 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [172.16.1.16] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08498D63402D; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:15:18 -0600 (CST)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:15:17 -0600
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5769)
Message-ID: <1B1E435D-B36F-4F18-B875-ED348D734A8F@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <18fd06a0-dc58-b185-66e9-ac60b8e249ac@network-heretics.com>
References: <A531C377-33A4-4138-BE28-788FF5FE267E@sn3rd.com> <CABcZeBPxQrzQZZ2ec+cvpovdkJaXcQ4f8Ged7Om1QPg7UrZ_Ew@mail.gmail.com> <C7451272-56CF-49C7-ABAA-7B8849AAE8DB@cisco.com> <31dc343f-8e73-6afd-1fca-c68fb5b47bd0@lounge.org> <fabe2570-d138-8f35-f14a-a564a00ea7ba@gont.com.ar> <c425e778-429f-eedb-b730-8b6f03dfaa0d@lounge.org> <8a9633db-ecd3-7ec7-e2a6-77088e68b184@huitema.net> <C6606DCF-768C-42A3-AF9B-6547A9A0FD04@gmail.com> <121a9c85-139a-50ec-81a0-1c1c56744d83@network-heretics.com> <31A5A4B7-CDB3-477B-AD7F-ABA42B9A3852@ietf.org> <09a31e49-8d3f-4876-679f-02e673fa0497@lounge.org> <0a28cadc-52bf-282b-8d1a-099de86ca07f@gmail.com> <d6e8e575-b983-1e9a-35a1-142024044a07@lounge.org> <4732EB01-0D2A-4C6E-B58D-489EBF570864@akamai.com> <ae42fb1b-e362-2632-ee04-ff9e1d867a86@lounge.org> <CD1B8572-E8E6-4E4C-9FFE-F038EFFABAE5@akamai.com> <7dc731ec-cc55-9231-c26f-ab0623bd138e@lounge.org> <67286F24-5D16-4341-885B-1005A8170B0C@ericsson.com> <18fd06a0-dc58-b185-66e9-ac60b8e249ac@network-heretics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/4BVLRy_PASNBMNQajWBfqc7rUWw>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-related WG
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:16:45 -0000

On 16 Feb 2021, at 10:53, Keith Moore wrote:

> On 2/16/21 11:49 AM, Francesca Palombini wrote:
>
>> I trust you can make your point and state your opinion without being 
>> purposely inflammatory. As always, although it is ok to disagree, it 
>> is not ok and does not lead to a productive discussion to put down 
>> other people's opinions in this way.
>
> I must emphatically disagree with your characterization, and I believe 
> you owe Dan an apology.

If so, please take that discussion offline to Francesca privately. Feel 
free to Cc me if you like. If there is output from that discussion, we 
can bring it back to the list, but it will not in any way be productive 
to have this discussion on the list.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email