Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 08 September 2021 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A7B3A0D85 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UDrsuBsqEtG0 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A6AA3A0D86 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4H42qW4fn7z1nrxM; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1631060471; bh=cboj32tFJB4jV052mq1ToJ5gTHDukdOv3hpIwCKHjV8=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=hDTqtjNM0Tx9tUreaBbZIPopw1Z/cqU5Kz96LZ0C5qG5uMzp1D3T/2lRfgq86OgFL AkUNIiWwACpDcU5XyXaMdzW9Avy1kf6LbA0sP3Ru1hE3AErX0hqjDVnJi0G0YXbilN 7W3A/wqFYyNnRCavhdttb2QcOohb9v8nUSkeX6F4=
X-Quarantine-ID: <k171W1b14seL>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.23.64] (50-233-136-230-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4H42qW0tbYz1nwDj; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: Pete Resnick <resnick=40episteme.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
References: <20210906191255.760B42778391@ary.qy> <6F720ED1-DFC6-4DF0-B36A-BE5379F10F5A@ietf.org> <E2BF3163-56E1-47BC-A608-F19AED04D361@mnot.net> <C8BF5ADB-CB36-4C8B-A14B-E9B39B016DCE@ietf.org> <4D704856-F291-4E39-BBA9-2C3A1ACACBC8@mnot.net> <CAChr6SxvB6eTi5B3WfM8-uX5soc+brh81sX6D2dzQTmgJ9dMNg@mail.gmail.com> <0C75A2F6-C0C6-4F66-B29D-5C2D892D5CBC@episteme.net>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <5c0028a3-ad6f-afe9-b7e4-0158ca114a51@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 20:21:09 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0C75A2F6-C0C6-4F66-B29D-5C2D892D5CBC@episteme.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/CEzAUf9e6wj2XkZBR55ckmIZ14s>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:21:18 -0000

That sounds right to me.

With regard to where to discuss this, while I personally would prefer to 
use gendispatch, if folks want another email list, we presumably could 
revive the old antitrust-policy list (without making it a working group) 
for discussion venue in support of the AD sponsorship.

Yours,
Joel

On 9/7/2021 1:38 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
> On 6 Sep 2021, at 21:01, Rob Sayre wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 6:57 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Great. BTW for the dispatch question, I agree that AD-sponsored is 
>>> the way to go here.
>>
>>  I think Mark's interpretation makes sense, from my perspective.
> 
> I have not yet consulted with my co-chair, so I'm not concluding the 
> dispatch discussion itself, but I believe I also heard in the discussion 
> "AD-sponsored is the way to go, with advice to the AD that discussion of 
> some issues is still required, perhaps before Last Call, and therefore a 
> forum of discussion should be identified." You should probably speak up 
> if I didn't get that right.
> 
> pr
>