IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Tue, 07 September 2021 05:38 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088533A0B21; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 22:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=episteme.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v2a0U0646rQh; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 22:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from helm.helm.episteme.net (helm.helm.episteme.net [209.51.32.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BB903A0B1F; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 22:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=episteme.net; s=mail; t=1630993104; bh=UHKguJ8eZUeMpiaaFFidrAaAEQ9D5HwGkstO3XFwjKE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Sblznm6yMrpY/7DDMBSntZR7E8d376BVQiztZ0BIoCoXsd0eaB0qlbHayFxHpkPAv B17iHxiHMuLRV/+oX16XY87wclJyGG+ME95FLsDAo71eqqLkdBclQXZY8Saed6XpFE KKFkaMKbVC0nkyT3uc+lKCcb55VG2Z+rI8uaptbI=
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>, GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 00:38:22 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5820)
Message-ID: <0C75A2F6-C0C6-4F66-B29D-5C2D892D5CBC@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SxvB6eTi5B3WfM8-uX5soc+brh81sX6D2dzQTmgJ9dMNg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20210906191255.760B42778391@ary.qy> <6F720ED1-DFC6-4DF0-B36A-BE5379F10F5A@ietf.org> <E2BF3163-56E1-47BC-A608-F19AED04D361@mnot.net> <C8BF5ADB-CB36-4C8B-A14B-E9B39B016DCE@ietf.org> <4D704856-F291-4E39-BBA9-2C3A1ACACBC8@mnot.net> <CAChr6SxvB6eTi5B3WfM8-uX5soc+brh81sX6D2dzQTmgJ9dMNg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/nTO8U9L-4dOOea1Z7Zun_acAaGc>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 05:38:33 -0000

On 6 Sep 2021, at 21:01, Rob Sayre wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 6:57 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
>> Great. BTW for the dispatch question, I agree that AD-sponsored is 
>> the way to go here.
>
>  I think Mark's interpretation makes sense, from my perspective.

I have not yet consulted with my co-chair, so I'm not concluding the 
dispatch discussion itself, but I believe I also heard in the discussion 
"AD-sponsored is the way to go, with advice to the AD that discussion of 
some issues is still required, perhaps before Last Call, and therefore a 
forum of discussion should be identified." You should probably speak up 
if I didn't get that right.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
Episteme Technology Consulting LLC
+1 217 337 1905

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email