IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 08 September 2021 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48493A2BC3; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 08:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1CFSNqWwv7od; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 08:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F503A2BC1; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 08:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.51.190]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 188FME6C022563; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 08:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1631114544; x=1631200944; i=@elandsys.com; bh=vrLe2hu7MxnkPE+BThBcfPEKgZXAi+LDMtVDqtTNbWw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=4Vrzrh/iLLzrBypsT6ssTtaZLEAgnku1UjRkQVi/Xx31XEMAH7Ss6Pu0MjQ54Pc4T DNmZqG5Gcc3n/vmEwM+awbWCE2wS8sJBPWHoDSyxD/dTyWrqQZKAoCmPIUDSkzJHe4 GZFD9e0h4xLWFnfGOxzrTHxVfNZP9wekwC8PxjK8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20210908081812.139851e8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 08:21:25 -0700
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, gendispatch@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <AC3AD2A4-1F99-4D14-8DBF-035C8FF9B345@cable.comcast.com>
References: <20210906191255.760B42778391@ary.qy> <6F720ED1-DFC6-4DF0-B36A-BE5379F10F5A@ietf.org> <E2BF3163-56E1-47BC-A608-F19AED04D361@mnot.net> <C8BF5ADB-CB36-4C8B-A14B-E9B39B016DCE@ietf.org> <4D704856-F291-4E39-BBA9-2C3A1ACACBC8@mnot.net> <CAChr6SxvB6eTi5B3WfM8-uX5soc+brh81sX6D2dzQTmgJ9dMNg@mail.gmail.com> <0C75A2F6-C0C6-4F66-B29D-5C2D892D5CBC@episteme.net> <e99a9947-9c37-63af-fa51-38cdf840f4b5@lear.ch> <17FF704B-4843-4092-B73A-A2768E85C0CF@episteme.net> <6d2317d0-08f2-1515-eb01-56486e45dcaa@lear.ch> <eb512394-e421-feac-b20d-a6280721358a@gmail.com> <CAChr6Sy3Eskt5dMxdi1Td=Zw4cCWSHfyUfuL4H+rSNqYPU07gw@mail.gmail.com> <AC3AD2A4-1F99-4D14-8DBF-035C8FF9B345@cable.comcast.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/UbCquHkG0rIn-LCvB_ID4zSHIRI>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 15:22:36 -0000

Hi Jason,
At 06:03 AM 08-09-2021, Livingood, Jason wrote:
>[JL] Please see Section 5 of the LLC's 12 August 2021 meeting 
>minutes at 
>https://www.ietf.org/media/documents/2021-08-12-llc-board-minutes.pdf. 
>We had counsel on the call as well for that discussion. My 
>impression is that the external legal environment continues to 
>evolve and that companies that current participate in the IETF may 
>face barriers to continuing to do so in the future, absent a more 
>concrete anti-trust document.

Thank you for providing some context.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email