IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice]

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Sun, 15 March 2015 05:17 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514431A1AAA; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OrPld1E-IK2S; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 049F31A1AA9; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1452; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1426396665; x=1427606265; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=tfxCvJHtW1WLXdeKk3kO5IOF4qAN/+UzlhsN03dWNVc=; b=IarfjMHRnzZj0heLpIoRVmtvaGqpJgVflzOwAL3cW5q485ZPAvqx97Ct yjHNgc3v6y7qnyrasjAgahCjKahaYH81+D0R+Jyc9WwchecIM+ZA3+R87 SAwjxwNqIjbPnraE1BtpkqQuAP4AWS317zfzuKClV0tXaqNk6nQE1KKYR c=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BSBQCqaeJU/49dJa1bgwaBLATILQKBGEMBAQEBAQF8hAwBAQEDAXkFCwIBCBgjCyERJQIEDgUOiAsDCQjIcA2FOAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGIsMgU90gioHgxaBFAWPOIFagS6EaYFGjQmGBCKCMoE8bwGBQ38BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,403,1422921600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="403507717"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2015 05:17:44 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2F5Hhag029965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 15 Mar 2015 05:17:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.149]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 00:17:43 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice]
Thread-Topic: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice]
Thread-Index: AQHQXhMMHxTW2Ra/Y0WeDKTRwFoW6J0dVmOA
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 05:17:43 +0000
Message-ID: <2AE2D092-C32A-46EB-88CA-71366965F4D7@cisco.com>
References: <20150116152211.25947.49086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20150117174430.9A0471ACE15@ietfa.amsl.com> <20150306163724.GA32205@verdi> <tsl385im2yp.fsf@mit.edu> <781553AA-EA2C-4057-9888-491C80A780DA@piuha.net> <54FE045D.3080606@qti.qualcomm.com> <tslr3sxep1l.fsf@mit.edu> <54FE6297.4090008@qti.qualcomm.com> <tslzj7i2wid.fsf@mit.edu> <55019E72.4090004@qti.qualcomm.com> <tslfv9a2t6p.fsf@mit.edu> <36671C44-DE53-4AC9-B8EA-465BF97B2FDB@piuha.net> <tsly4n0zo6g.fsf@mit.edu> <550350C4.9040201@qti.qualcomm.com> <5503914A.7060209@gmail.com> <5503BF22.5020902@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5503BF22.5020902@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.122]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_33F42983-9388-404E-B5D0-1D0FA7AAA99A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5O6GDWTaENQP5bm4xBysswYFdR0>
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 05:17:46 -0000

> On Mar 13, 2015, at 9:54 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Or does it also include people appointed by ADs (WG chairs
> and secretaries, Directorate members)?
> 
> This needs to be clarified. And they are two very different cases.

Hmm. AFAIK, a WG secretary is appointed by the chair, not the AD, or at least not necessarily the AD. And we could discuss, if we really wanted to descend into the pit of despair, scribes...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email