IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice

James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com> Tue, 10 March 2015 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@nestlabs.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9701A8F37 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KYkbQL-L9Ou5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com (mail-oi0-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95F331A8AF8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oiga141 with SMTP id a141so4458725oig.8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cLHIcaLk6Qs8oQb1GK4BDav96dnoxAkzRzGFSo8dfQI=; b=T5BSP9rdQTcvG3BSM0i/alNyzzNTk8NwV0AUivtXANO0qdWAi6q/q7EWaBy+o5p5uq jX3gRQfj2l4/g0fy7DqQb9+9nl8COzGGOZ4Ky4AbGU6kLB9JIW3t9j5p8R4lzTlN2yTj z/s5zrzdsVVdLunRyOTpKTqGeb05aN1nzOWmcHxTDbYQm4ijUEBbVjU9oHKP3eOqc1Ow mKbpKahIWRsi69UvXG3nNKZcIEVahRmyPdoV3qC0KQH5LY1n0M+0uGqovTpHkwQ5fS+K /4jjxhyMZiJNiLogwpe1P02UPSZr42/g0kPcypNwpX3gO26LPMiIwmqrSJ4DqzDSk5Mz KViw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnG4/RjCwjfyBK9+M+W28YjOsHj5d5osPz+87NZhgMLhwmlX+o7kT0Hd2YfEGZkuZSeAVHP
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.72.200 with SMTP id f8mr26908655obv.51.1426026501906; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.150.2 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3740BE65-0C21-4120-B9A4-EAE93E57F8E9@piuha.net>
References: <20150116152211.25947.49086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20150117174430.9A0471ACE15@ietfa.amsl.com> <275BDAE9-2855-44E8-852D-009A15CE8892@piuha.net> <54FEAF51.4060807@cisco.com> <CADhXe53QecMRgxwe9x7RbMZUk9ec90WU_3G1Xc1qX_fB4UFUkA@mail.gmail.com> <021201d05b78$70c13de0$5243b9a0$@olddog.co.uk> <3740BE65-0C21-4120-B9A4-EAE93E57F8E9@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:28:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CADhXe51hZLSm8tbY00HQCSQim=uhBPU0bX4TF1-4BOL1FM9TsA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice
From: James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2f4dc163cbc0510f6abc5"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dDwi6UZkkM2864C7Is0E88ngp9Q>
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk, IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 22:28:24 -0000

I'm persuaded that further debate could do more harm than help, and I don't
want to open up further debate that would harm the effort to adopt a good
policy. I'm confident that an ombudsteam can use good judgment to be
sufficiently inclusive whatever the policy lists in the text.

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:

> I wanted to say that I’m in agreement with Adrian on this. Ultimately,
> no list will be complete, some judgment needs to apply, and I
> think we’ve covered this in the text better than if we attempted
> to expand the list.
>
> (And I am, of course, in agreement with Stewart that things that
> he lists are definitely important and certainly should not be misused
> in any professional discussion.)
>
> Jari
>
>


-- 
james woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
Nest Labs, Communications Engineering

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email