Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 19 March 2015 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5574D1ACD42 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xUFTpK2EM8ca for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2691E1A0222 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B58CBEBF; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:45:33 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yQjikIbJoff9; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:45:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.73] (unknown [86.46.20.71]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB21FBEBE; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:45:28 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <550AE108.1090306@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:45:28 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'Jari Arkko' <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, 'IETF Discussion List' <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt
References: <5503914A.7060209@gmail.com> <5503BF22.5020902@gmail.com> <2AE2D092-C32A-46EB-88CA-71366965F4D7@cisco.com> <5505D873.1040203@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbQf_2WUn8PrUXCMy_3w6tt+iJw0tyF=gUojA5fwRXJNg@mail.gmail.com> <550736E0.6080101@dcrocker.net> <20150316203250.GJ2179@mx1.yitter.info> <55073F22.6000606@dcrocker.net> <20150316204616.GK2179@mx1.yitter.info> <55074AC1.9080500@dcrocker.net> <20150316214620.GO2179@mx1.yitter.info> <550751AC.7090108@dcrocker.net> <55075EBA.4000905@gmail.com> <5509BB58.4060307@qti.qualcomm.com> <B714CBFE-5D3D-4293-91C2-534A3437EB24@piuha.net> <014401d0624e$5220d940$f6628bc0$@olddog.co.uk> <550ADD5A.6040805@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <550ADD5A.6040805@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/W0BTvwZ4KcDmhbpFqOJNRqfOtTo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:45:37 -0000

Hi Stewart,

On 19/03/15 14:29, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> I suspect that it would probably be less of a
> problem if the Ombudsteam were Nomcom appointees
> rather than IETF chair appointees.

I think the ombudsman role is such that we'd prefer
that when we find a good one, and have trained them
in the complexities of the role, then we'd like to
keep that him or her doing the job more or less for
as long as we can. Contrariwise, if we end up with
an out-of-control ombudsman then I think we need to
fix that very quickly.

So, having the IETF chair pick 'em and fire 'em as
in the current draft is better I'd say.

S.