Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

On 12/03/15 15:01, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
> I look forward to understanding what people think better than I do today.

FWIW, I think we made the correct call in terms of keeping two
different bits of process (ombudsteam and recalls) separated,
but also accept that that might look entirely wrong to those
outside the IESG, and I think we should take Sam's concern
seriously as input on that.

So better wording would be good, and if that needs another LC
to get community input on it, then that's ok too if we can
constrain that additional LC to the things that have changed.

S.

PS: I've yet to properly read Dave's review, so not sure if
there's stuff there that needs to be similarly addressed.