IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 10 March 2015 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D5F1A9043 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x8o69BUOONeh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:03:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCDE1A9040 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FFF2CEEE; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:03:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WNLfUhlG_Q6h; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:03:31 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896F72CECD; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:03:31 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6AB03589-14D4-4BB4-8D9A-6DD240AE786A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <54FE09D7.90806@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:03:33 +0200
Message-Id: <0D7450E9-44BD-4FF0-877B-1684020E874B@piuha.net>
References: <20150116152211.25947.49086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAK3OfOib=YwpW3sM04Wg0+vf3m+eykO1H2Kwxa_rRvnmdym=Ww@mail.gmail.com> <54FE09D7.90806@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/y2NhXYm1V-DGJTqz9gz6pzQfj30>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 22:03:37 -0000

Mike, Brian,

>> It would be useful to distribute that written assessment from the 
>> insurance and liability folks to the list or at least publish it.
> 
> In general I am all for such transparency. But actually, I don't
> think it would serve the IETF well in this case to publish the
> analysis of hypothetical litigation - it would simply feed free
> legal advice to hypothetical litigators.

I have asked if we can provide a short statement about this,
while keeping in mind the concern that Brian correctly raises.
Stay tuned.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email