Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 19 March 2015 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404D01ACD38 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xnNgaNU41E7q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27DE1ACD37 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BA82CCD1; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:40:43 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r_6uPzrsyWI7; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:40:42 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA8D2CC4D; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:40:41 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_28F2C7A9-7DE7-45AE-B78A-2FBAF11C337B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: Sam's text and way forward on the last call of draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <550AD7BD.7010602@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:40:40 +0000
Message-Id: <BBD379D9-3E13-4BEA-AB03-D885564C5167@piuha.net>
References: <5503914A.7060209@gmail.com> <5503BF22.5020902@gmail.com> <2AE2D092-C32A-46EB-88CA-71366965F4D7@cisco.com> <5505D873.1040203@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbQf_2WUn8PrUXCMy_3w6tt+iJw0tyF=gUojA5fwRXJNg@mail.gmail.com> <550736E0.6080101@dcrocker.net> <20150316203250.GJ2179@mx1.yitter.info> <55073F22.6000606@dcrocker.net> <20150316204616.GK2179@mx1.yitter.info> <55074AC1.9080500@dcrocker.net> <20150316214620.GO2179@mx1.yitter.info> <550751AC.7090108@dcrocker.net> <55075EBA.4000905@gmail.com> <5509BB58.4060307@qti.qualcomm.com> <B714CBFE-5D3D-4293-91C2-534A3437EB24@piuha.net> <550AD1D5.8060404@cisco.com> <550AD7BD.7010602@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jsp1Jd9d_YcAczjRTBtIdVahm6s>
Cc: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:40:46 -0000

> 
> Jari can speak for himself when he gets off of the plane, but I do not believe his intention was to re-open the structure of the entire document. 

That’s right.

Anyway, I’m reading the responses far too quickly to provide
good feedback yet on what Eliot said. And I need to close
the laptop in a few minutes. 

But to explain: we have to solve the issue that had
been raised, and there are some alternative ways
to do that. I have a strong preference to staying with
the current document structure. Part of my goal in
sending out the initial message was to gauge if we are
happy with the type of text that Sam proposed, or
whether people believe bigger surgery is needed.
I think some of the alternative designs may have
issues beyond needing more time to edit, but
for the moment we should put that aside. I was
trying to determine if there are other proposals than
Sam’s on the table.

Jari