Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice]

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 16 March 2015 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7490E1A90E1; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VXjGmYwKRMPv; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1DA1A90E0; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (unknown [50.189.173.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A2E58A035; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 20:46:18 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:46:16 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice]
Message-ID: <20150316204616.GK2179@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <tsly4n0zo6g.fsf@mit.edu> <550350C4.9040201@qti.qualcomm.com> <5503914A.7060209@gmail.com> <5503BF22.5020902@gmail.com> <2AE2D092-C32A-46EB-88CA-71366965F4D7@cisco.com> <5505D873.1040203@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbQf_2WUn8PrUXCMy_3w6tt+iJw0tyF=gUojA5fwRXJNg@mail.gmail.com> <550736E0.6080101@dcrocker.net> <20150316203250.GJ2179@mx1.yitter.info> <55073F22.6000606@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55073F22.6000606@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bGjltfXEkHMswmQqlowhsljDp5U>
Cc: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 20:46:20 -0000

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 01:37:54PM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
> However I'm not clear about the pragmatics, given the the Ombud, or
> whoever makes the request, has confidentiality requirements that limit
> what they can say to the person with the authority to remove the
> miscreant...

Someone who has no formal authority but is influential has two ways to
make that influence effective:

1.  Lobby in private, saying nasty things about someone or whatever to
someone who _does_ have authority.  In that case, the abuse-redress
procedure actually needs to go after the person with the actual power,
because that's what's being exercised.

2.  Be abusive in public.  In this case, the official office-holder
either needs to do something or else, again, be implicated in the
abuse.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com