Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice]

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 16 March 2015 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B751A875B; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id urbLKHsYDLsb; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07411A8756; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lamx15 with SMTP id x15so40692337lam.3; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=THmpnI46eNSzLgy6bTtMhcrFWHSD6aRbDrpZsvWG2q8=; b=kxGjyAOLkj0TcSmArm3qU5Xjbx6rDlj3qhfQLMqRHtHg4FYgHG498qdY4M7y7uvCyG rnsjdoKqhDpCL03Whz1+EJ4UQDqwZSSaFq145qIULsB3prdVBYbIwsLRMiRmftmLe8lh 0+R2Zg2DN0u+h0Bc/m4CZ2N976tezLqsZmthF2/l4OsUASZtKRG28TR1/baXmh4Fqebr DFDA6mgSSvXC4pXI2lWRL/n5lK7C/urxu8DroVdjgMHe4GFzhGK/3BejnE3PfC/8xIBS /7z8nU3dQAN3uPdCenz31u4rNGEoyd4npFMXdyDQcHsgCXqkYUfA7nsedJE/5OwA0huM B/iw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.148.38 with SMTP id tp6mr55146512lbb.82.1426514557398; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.152.183.34 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <50369CD579C63FE8E549BCA6@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
References: <20150116152211.25947.49086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20150117174430.9A0471ACE15@ietfa.amsl.com> <20150306163724.GA32205@verdi> <tsl385im2yp.fsf@mit.edu> <781553AA-EA2C-4057-9888-491C80A780DA@piuha.net> <54FE045D.3080606@qti.qualcomm.com> <tslr3sxep1l.fsf@mit.edu> <54FE6297.4090008@qti.qualcomm.com> <tslzj7i2wid.fsf@mit.edu> <55019E72.4090004@qti.qualcomm.com> <tslfv9a2t6p.fsf@mit.edu> <36671C44-DE53-4AC9-B8EA-465BF97B2FDB@piuha.net> <tsly4n0zo6g.fsf@mit.edu> <550350C4.9040201@qti.qualcomm.com> <5503914A.7060209@gmail.com> <5503BF22.5020902@gmail.com> <2AE2D092-C32A-46EB-88CA-71366965F4D7@cisco.com> <5505D873.1040203@gmail.com> <50369CD579C63FE8E549BCA6@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:02:37 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: dixhOOKLlomQ-8HN0z3XoQl9fpo
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+6EXPiXvLD4ihinoTg6pRB_uTM6MC7nEScdk_Q4Zs1MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What is a "management position? [Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice]
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5R0N1C11DH0fFTW9Em4CLBT2cgg>
Cc: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:02:41 -0000

>> Actually, RFC 2418 leaves it unclear who appoints a WG
>> Secretary. I think it's been common for WG Chairs to get an OK
>> from the AD, at least. But your point is taken: what needs
>> clarifying is whether the term "management position" includes
>> all appointees, as well as positions filled by the NomCom.
>
> Given the context in which this came up, it is also important to
> note that the set of people who can, in theory, be recalled (who
> might plausibly be "management") is not the same as the set of
> people appointed by the Nomcom (some of whom might, I suppose,
> not be)/

That point, at least, is easy to take care of by referring to them not
as "appointed by NomCom," but as "subject to the recall procedures in
RFC 7437," which procedures now include all sitting IAOC members,
including those not appointed by the NomCom.

Barry