IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 09 March 2015 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB721ACE1D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.044
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.044 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jyJWtTDZ0Zke for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D201A9308 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8751F5408A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=X1NXhhudXosv1YLAjiAs 9htZN84=; b=LSiah9x20pIKN1ogpKHnRwuXrjoln/H2ZUoc0E8d2CFPEWniIQ2+ wqcp4XTRy8hHv+vsi+kTsE/IlOdMKecxphb3mZof3sEgEOyqO0PkuDUhpTTzOgeE 8+BZMaHrH4XYIRhYK00RVwLC7PcCuUOxFFErI8rcHUZK1QjC91ynq9k=
Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (mail-ie0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73A1154085 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iebtr6 with SMTP id tr6so34749506ieb.4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.167 with SMTP id x7mr25955865igl.28.1425943695033; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.130.66 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tslmw3leoqi.fsf@mit.edu>
References: <20150116152211.25947.49086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAK3OfOib=YwpW3sM04Wg0+vf3m+eykO1H2Kwxa_rRvnmdym=Ww@mail.gmail.com> <tslmw3leoqi.fsf@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 18:28:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOgYMjeSnk+MHdN=J3qQYf+Anoy2MguyPv1dtV8QfvXbhw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05.txt> (IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures) to Best Current Practice
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LW9pn3nSPeU6ZtRqxa0UlOHBOpQ>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:28:19 -0000

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote:
> Would specific examples help you understand the situation enough that
> it's worth bringing them up?

No, your word is enough for me, Sam.

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email