IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Terminology discussion threads

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 13 August 2020 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6983A1080; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MbiTldM9sRum; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 664333A07F8; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A01C548011; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:48:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 1323C440059; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:48:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:48:19 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, IETF Sergeant-at-Arms <saa@ietf.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Terminology discussion threads
Message-ID: <20200813194819.GB14418@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <9ABDC2BC-E6A3-4249-99C5-F0BB3683A03D@ietf.org> <223A1539-30B0-424A-89D1-A968FFD4C140@symbolic.software> <aceec35c-ccc8-ccca-7a5b-7d23746f67e2@ietf.org> <A9BB633C-3278-406C-BD38-748646D7E454@symbolic.software> <C4BC10B5-6F65-451F-8B15-98AA8D54966A@ietf.org> <m2sgcq4fq1.wl-randy@psg.com> <20200813181549.GA27732@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <6EDEF995-7D31-42D4-83C7-B9C406962516@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6EDEF995-7D31-42D4-83C7-B9C406962516@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/JPGnu3izzghMZp67Lba_U-PYS-w>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:48:27 -0000

At least there seems to be sufficient +1 from distinguished community
members such as current or past IAB, IESG members, IAB Liaison, IETF ISOC
appointee, IRTF and NomCom chair to hope that the action taken was rightfully
within the privilege of IETF chair according to the rules.

If this step was ultimately determined (by whom... ?) not to be within
the privilege of IETF chair then i am bit worried about what i would
have to think about all those +1.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 04:17:29PM -0300, Carlos M. Martinez wrote:
> 
> There may have been more ???+1???s, but declaring consensus on this issue
> would be??? adventurous??? to put it mildly.
> 
> /Carlos
> 
> On 13 Aug 2020, at 15:15, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> 
> > Randy: There seems to be more than rough consensus from many IETF
> > leadership
> > representatives that this is the right course of action from the number
> > of
> > +1 reactions to this thread.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email