IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Self-moderation

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 17 August 2020 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4303A1057 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vqB-doVFFwct for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE853A1055 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id f1so16179725wro.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Zj3MEeusBAxKK/vTvjbZsnLtyTTF+MIRlL3NLV82o7s=; b=EKSyHtEKfiWYTF59b3IpyCX0l4HYktUTt4OZN6x2GkrPr5NGlnq53tqCtiXEFzWniO lF8yGr/Iw/U0fJ4MOvkF7lykwxb7S+Wgtb4fBQOmRqFG16Nu5a0Cp7Q235HdQPFHoHAn gyCYxRN3WWBz4hV2eIb+i5j/AVRD8YPRpWqXoYwHA933vffJu8UCGR6pDBRAz0e47tbG C44f4yPKXUJR/Sjy2ea0Slyq/Y0bo4RvI4atXdmqeQm4ucUcDSYfrcrNkQoYi/QMIkmD joiT1gSLtFL79doIUxcNBvkuHKkqdhaK0vSUbS21e6Vb9qmvam2aXvKZYs84rptLXevk VCKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Zj3MEeusBAxKK/vTvjbZsnLtyTTF+MIRlL3NLV82o7s=; b=thBrNm1GGUsNNWVDadVTAalOT6M9BU5WUNIxs5Q2q32aE0kg9DMAe8CRoxqnrKrHNI EnXkwAl1QN51oD129ASgmACHFueD99MhTSYTkuLc68pwcspbmqfOlgKvu/UtMvoKYeR+ fFVSylDivRbfx1rx05Up5lqSfi5+Uv4ricPmgneD/8Bwh9wG1+QYoZenK5U9Mq/ClN7q ILE63qGtcg1q1Q8f5nacoPgZrRS2IlUM9vLU1Q0Y+En3M9QmlCKG0eymP7VtUkOoggnm jrQjk1PwwW9yoUDFJq5V6nOpcbv2Jao1+iC5l5X4N4q8w/sbN5rMi+BLaEI5MOT0z+n3 E/ng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531srKOIwv/AsQjStfbQxgyA3LqbuNqoTDcI2G8uTjDeGJzn/juM r3H9eXu9YzQ0GSqbspiXW6g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUqlq75YXo8Dwl/uxcMmahuUU33De10uCEv2V8U06hvlmtLQ/H94Tl/+oI0fhXF6ZZACOrFg==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:438c:: with SMTP id i12mr18009534wrq.210.1597694893454; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.46] ([62.3.64.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l21sm29125363wmj.25.2020.08.17.13.08.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <1B217702-A1E6-4D6F-9028-BF5025F6F2E1@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7187FC69-C8F5-4D93-A345-63F41A939251"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Subject: Re: Self-moderation
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 21:07:39 +0100
In-Reply-To: <A5CE4192E3FE9B8606D89231@PSB>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
References: <6AA0BCBB-D95B-4036-B94D-5E79E7B94D75@ietf.org> <F15E387D-9FDC-4A76-8002-78B85F6D16BE@nohats.ca> <CABcZeBNitWbdPO4Y2WfCzjy10Z+s27px6cGT1uRHmtGHa5iX+Q@mail.gmail.com> <ed227fd5-3277-d7a9-f93d-b259944009d6@huitema.net> <591c0ee0-d444-3e8b-e4bd-5a9f6ffb518e@gmail.com> <CABmDk8mG=c7+uy+2jbtX5hedURy1b9w0nLQ8b9deU=XHyDDzww@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-eOcFopeyKyQMA8540P-GwPbqrO-0eHuJrqUP3fKDJPZw@mail.gmail.c om> <CAHw9_iKQC7xp-qGmyhUmLof0yujXHVXw3vt1KuJLqxhisPCjZw@mail.gmail.com> <A5CE4192E3FE9B8606D89231@PSB>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/nHcS8qx4HY11XzV8v92pnYFrAVQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:08:17 -0000


> On 17 Aug 2020, at 19:19, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> 
> Perhaps if the mailing list system returned messages above, say,
> the fifth in an hour on a given thread or the tenth on a given
> list in 24 hours with a careful reminder and request for
> confirmation before the message was distributed, that might
> help.  No censorship, just a way to slow things down a bit and
> slow the rate of temperature rise.   The mere fact of having a
> message returned or held for confirmation would provide a small
> cooling-off period.  

John

Such a approach would seem inappropriate if the thread concerned a last call issue.

The risk is that the +1s trigger your message throttle/inhibit algorithm, and then perhaps lead to a genuine issue being posted.

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email