IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Terminology discussion threads

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Fri, 14 August 2020 05:29 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6633E3A0CE0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 22:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZckls5C1PgC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 22:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2DA13A0D22 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 22:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id x6so3979227pgx.12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 22:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gJXZNQmmerNN3GOWdtu0Pe+ihB1qZ6YUnanl4AXnTA0=; b=FBWaXLLQoRyPCrie7n6KrFNb42+E+fUvCD17RY1yeR1JmFKUryR+ZOSZj+JbmKHU5t AetF8TqRTneLu44xiDFiquajK6f3Ew5pYwcxGGafzs98+TXVqhG05QbcjoU72MXRZRVQ iaTL/xerYwwNBvlSdAoP8g4sTI1c7PjZOocxkGg9Q3GIm0vlHSNgijtFp3lNLnF/ciJR +glOcKZZwtAJYxO3IEFbL3/Wpw06SS55Px1fgiEiExi7YbIxFceAqwKq/q5DDDXQwD83 EfWaFMWENcRrjIdYT/JP9m7i9ZAdJYJ1+CGzgJynbHaAy7/CFZjPbMeaBMxV8QJsonnt 4KQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gJXZNQmmerNN3GOWdtu0Pe+ihB1qZ6YUnanl4AXnTA0=; b=MuGjKj0XPovvvb/GluJUmin56Xe5+Z5y2jDAxew/tUDV94c7VX+aw6lDpPQerr1sfg 1LQty5odX2k2phZ8R+kOHZtcVqEJhCG8k3fxFAj9h70RXgu0OSpEOnB7k5p2v2AwfK9m Wp0dvR99ritcEzicmI3c58RjNzY7PsoEjC05jeKXVb4ORF87K2YcccADnCk3qEibK7IA Qs5CNWt0dPaP7YwTCcmP7rlwCo77WuEsVuZrnNmvj7hBiIvhuzJJ0maMGfnmpVe6n6Dv RZ68GLEeVoMmHOl2PHA94lbh0Zpj5GiiLVqTKTU3AVJZyywJm8ueSwl5NkV+YHeOPerO Qarw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531cD7QrONysOz9abWtHqGDmBnt/qtLXd10TeHCWfcvp1y6fEmK5 ayNHf/N5vGELnbJK5uqH2HfhUEbHXuo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzL675ts9SI9b8HcSbnNjlpAQBx3FlAiOKwep3+4UjBPXpgWopk8JNMcfPOn9eodxonnFx3kw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:4726:: with SMTP id u38mr737024pga.246.1597382975484; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 22:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aspen.local (63-140-73-14-rb1.jnu.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.73.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n18sm6753320pgd.91.2020.08.13.22.29.34 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 22:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Terminology discussion threads
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <9ABDC2BC-E6A3-4249-99C5-F0BB3683A03D@ietf.org> <223A1539-30B0-424A-89D1-A968FFD4C140@symbolic.software> <aceec35c-ccc8-ccca-7a5b-7d23746f67e2@ietf.org> <A9BB633C-3278-406C-BD38-748646D7E454@symbolic.software> <C4BC10B5-6F65-451F-8B15-98AA8D54966A@ietf.org> <m2sgcq4fq1.wl-randy@psg.com> <20200813181549.GA27732@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <6EDEF995-7D31-42D4-83C7-B9C406962516@gmail.com> <20200813194819.GB14418@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <3af06ea0-5702-e357-2177-ea7de38f09c3@comcast.net> <CAL02cgQzhuO1QeLh5Bbu8k4fPyVeLy-XwRHZLL7575dEgGRc6w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <fe4b3ec5-21e6-fa90-e56a-f3b6231ed3b9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:29:32 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgQzhuO1QeLh5Bbu8k4fPyVeLy-XwRHZLL7575dEgGRc6w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_uC7dm1si8efpX8AF9S86S0fVUs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 05:29:38 -0000

On 8/13/20 12:31 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> Given the level of unprofessional discourse in the muted conversation,
> muting the entire topic seems like an entirely appropriate recourse.

FWIW I support moving the discussion (we do that all the time)
and do not support the SAA's message shutting down criticism of
the decision to move the discussion.  It's disappointing to see
the two things being conflated, but tends to support my growing
belief that the IETF is irredeemable.

Melinda

-- 
Melinda Shore
melinda.shore@gmail.com

Software longa, hardware brevis

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status