IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Terminology discussion threads

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Fri, 14 August 2020 02:05 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB03F3A0C06; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Csru70c5g1NV; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eastern.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (eastern.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E56FB3A0C04; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01414100D31; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 02:05:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-23-22.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.23.22]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 38F5E101065; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 02:05:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.8); Fri, 14 Aug 2020 02:05:05 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Harmony-Drop: 1ca705604f691896_1597370705471_4107106872
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1597370705471:4198584252
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1597370705471
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CB680C21; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=4J2ccHVOEtEXZ2 AUQdEEjevHQGw=; b=TVpMwkRSG7nysFzxvm+T1tOW7u6Ic80Pdfsf/bwH64zn8V owafqZ5IeFEyg7d0TqIYMCxEPpB+bi6CaeWtBSIgoLS0yqGu1CMALTkbbsVH9yIg jUOmuvok+OCw1QgmAvNbH32cjNxUM7jPoxNgBQeHLzv/j8zm94pl1DzD6oKLc=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F5F880C07; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:05:01 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a88
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: gendispatch@ietf.org
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Terminology discussion threads
Message-ID: <20200814020459.GH3100@localhost>
References: <9ABDC2BC-E6A3-4249-99C5-F0BB3683A03D@ietf.org> <6AA0BCBB-D95B-4036-B94D-5E79E7B94D75@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6AA0BCBB-D95B-4036-B94D-5E79E7B94D75@ietf.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrleeigdehgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefftdektefhueetveeigfefgeejteejvdfhhefgvddtfeeujeehleeguefhgffhgfenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhm
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/UNW2TZA8QeVYbkYnsnsBRQXxV-4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 02:05:10 -0000

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 09:48:30PM -0400, IETF Chair wrote:
> I believe we wind up in this kind of situation over and over because
> IETF participants have no shared norms about respecting each other or
> demonstrating empathy towards one another. With no norms about
> respecting one another as human beings, no value assigned to composing
> thoughtful replies, and no expectation of simply treating each other
> with kindness on the list, our discussions devolve into toxic, snarky,
> knee-jerk back-and-forth. Without norms, processes like the one
> established in RFC 3005 are not worth much.

This is the least empathic message in all of this thread.

Some of us have been quite polite, professional, and reasoned in our
positions that do not support yours.  We get no credit.  Instead we see
insinuations and bullying by the leadership and others.

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email