IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Terminology discussion threads

"Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com> Thu, 13 August 2020 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEC93A1066; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TaFD0DxoRUwn; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38E543A1065; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id s23so5204341qtq.12; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fJSIyH0ub0pfnY2foogN/1aiiIB4AdygvJNemOTVmhg=; b=TMPkE/1X1VZIUpUUBUt7oVBoSpzm6qHnIMN9hWqFISFflEjIASJNTqX7UO8ysKRfVp uB4QLOx0WT+VApkBzZ3S4zFiiDvCKpyqNsHPLAq54MXGQbKXpmar3dNQ+K49q54g7Grw 84qOePA0Ep0ymwUlKAiOeN77TWUf0hjYM6/7i5SirCqW6Ofocfj3TXh5PUnKncYXXXCU oF390OtSv+/Rk3X6Kv68erOygiAwfAnYyKU+33qSwiHoudjRLmaUNVEkB3AbZVPRcDlj jNM0ICa1+B6HVFGPwjeJJ3gCIA4usSaxqRQs10V7pZXGLYP71tElaPBcrujJvUW4PEUj Oizw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fJSIyH0ub0pfnY2foogN/1aiiIB4AdygvJNemOTVmhg=; b=sRBiTsTAmJuUE3ArOUUMwYKkRqOOzd+MWfnRy0h1rzP7MSU5fLsZtbuqevGLGVZgHV +j+1VMIqTWFkK7eRHM+p7nfnD5hhAZMYeLF66IqRYAUsS3lTrTohslf1SLXRf20lSFZX qD2berhxE7tnpAOFLBNZq2XgKSQCzxPNCIkkiY6+5a8XEgBOAG9xtj9k2Eot8l6d/9Rb fPscjIEhT3XWeNNDHMB8HxJxyfG5uf2c/2CzcaOgRBV7f58CW/N7C3y4232GRir1q0O3 uoaJpJKXt5aRobGnSwZc9etHQ4ceaKnnX3Obkfl2HlImQ363fMeUeYu1cfqBy2HJPBZJ HOjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fK2p55CDTSzVzaJS7ziTVdguGlKxMOOswJ6tyQO8xK8LzGkGA CTFz84cPdK5ommWughfGcfA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwoTNgDRhFNq3JxwcjPxcvlj0VSlgJXwYR+/MfIc3EqoukgIybkiCVXEiTBB/zuUyHSkjsrLA==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4d41:: with SMTP id x1mr7045521qtv.16.1597346255077; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.89.41] (r167-60-88-25.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy. [167.60.88.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j190sm6401177qkd.22.2020.08.13.12.17.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, IETF Sergeant-at-Arms <saa@ietf.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Terminology discussion threads
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:17:29 -0300
X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6146)
Message-ID: <6EDEF995-7D31-42D4-83C7-B9C406962516@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200813181549.GA27732@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <9ABDC2BC-E6A3-4249-99C5-F0BB3683A03D@ietf.org> <223A1539-30B0-424A-89D1-A968FFD4C140@symbolic.software> <aceec35c-ccc8-ccca-7a5b-7d23746f67e2@ietf.org> <A9BB633C-3278-406C-BD38-748646D7E454@symbolic.software> <C4BC10B5-6F65-451F-8B15-98AA8D54966A@ietf.org> <m2sgcq4fq1.wl-randy@psg.com> <20200813181549.GA27732@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/d9-B3imR8JSzCkCHlQaPvBcyiWU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:17:38 -0000

There may have been more “+1”s, but declaring consensus on this 
issue would be… adventurous… to put it mildly.

/Carlos

On 13 Aug 2020, at 15:15, Toerless Eckert wrote:

> Randy: There seems to be more than rough consensus from many IETF 
> leadership
> representatives that this is the right course of action from the 
> number of
> +1 reactions to this thread.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email