Re: On plenary functions

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Mon, 17 August 2020 19:20 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625DD3A0A02 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.845
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.845 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rba3xlUiTMhH for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A1DC3A09FF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE44ED41 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:20:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:20:29 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=7D8p/i0Zuk/Nvr+eWgmpVqOn6U7l9bbdGWp+1OF+a dE=; b=AZF8Et7vndB9eupfN1Cns5VEsNJovyFJhlk6NKiWorBbaDpI0wwth7p3d ofELboD+2H8B9Mn4H9Rk8jTBec9oi6YPLO5pTHZIXWT8ZqBNa3WKzsnY0d8Kp+nn Cd3XGL1WShbFcMgAb3Sju1iONGnasPKaNy3RtPfbIQqGtFW1VQWBXYaEVPh6hQa1 PIaL2eHH0O7O1DEyzxh0ZWepuZ20gYmJ2u4eQbXoJ2jvZ++pXUGZEpnhdpUCioEx LWUeDLNrmrh0mqXVnQPfUUXg2ctacr2kEocMg8kvaY6Rb/TmNQnGK+QZlYEopF6Q qr7sPBkX44dOcV1jSh0S4N31ViDlA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:fNg6Xxkv7zMcEv1dGP7q5dgjS-d6cXYZ7-3zZhyHjMigluAfOMTG_A>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedruddtgedggeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtke ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehhfeutdehfe fgfefghfekhefguefgieduueegjeekfeelleeuieffteefueduueenucfkphepuddtkedr vddvuddrudektddrudehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:fNg6X82fKWIR8MzcyfGYuEQTRBcJBQasqdmptfctHrjBh7ImhTtDEw> <xmx:fNg6X3qQpz9O93Ok9uFFgxeh_0MzklfnZF_fktWgK3BgvM-N7Q3Fig> <xmx:fNg6XxmMgeeQB-Q8vJExGjChSOJLQz4RVUlKTINqnbqnJUeDcnww0g> <xmx:fNg6XzX2I2fbgoizuEeenixJrytGFw1XhIzh_R17G9YdGVWPZYywWw>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 344BB328005E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:20:28 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: On plenary functions
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <9ABDC2BC-E6A3-4249-99C5-F0BB3683A03D@ietf.org> <223A1539-30B0-424A-89D1-A968FFD4C140@symbolic.software> <aceec35c-ccc8-ccca-7a5b-7d23746f67e2@ietf.org> <A9BB633C-3278-406C-BD38-748646D7E454@symbolic.software> <C4BC10B5-6F65-451F-8B15-98AA8D54966A@ietf.org> <m2sgcq4fq1.wl-randy@psg.com> <20200813181549.GA27732@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <6EDEF995-7D31-42D4-83C7-B9C406962516@gmail.com> <20200813194819.GB14418@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <3af06ea0-5702-e357-2177-ea7de38f09c3@comcast.net> <CAL02cgQzhuO1QeLh5Bbu8k4fPyVeLy-XwRHZLL7575dEgGRc6w@mail.gmail.com> <fe4b3ec5-21e6-fa90-e56a-f3b6231ed3b9@gmail.com> <CB38947B-46A1-42E4-B252-7DE56C4C1DF3@symbolic.software> <CAHw9_iKj3dV6AUGMZoqM1uNUauOwRdTaWxumVyJZo2pF=Xq9ew@mail.gmail.com> <4B220438-063C-487F-93E0-C67F55D07E29@cisco.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <f494afa7-1b38-d634-9f53-0b4d278e1d09@network-heretics.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:20:27 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B220438-063C-487F-93E0-C67F55D07E29@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gIzfB6JMPFpqzKFh3yYxD0dPpfo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 19:20:31 -0000

On 8/17/20 11:06 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:

> I wonder if we should have a daily message limit, at least at the 
> thread level, and if people couldn’t hold themselves to that, then at 
> the aggregate level.  That allows for due process, fair warning, and a 
> bit more inclusivity, perhaps even leading to people giving a lot of 
> thought before they press <send>.

On the flip side, it also encourages "piling on" - lots of people trying 
to shout down one or two lone voices knowing that those voices can only 
respond to a few messages.

(That's part of why I've never been a huge fan of the weekly message 
volume summaries.   Another part is that byte count is not a good proxy 
for message text volume, though that part could be fixed.)

Keith