Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Dirk Steinberg <dirk@lapishills.com> Fri, 29 May 2020 20:42 UTC
Return-Path: <dirk@lapishills.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B640D3A106C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lapishills-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FTwR9uAdeH3E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D78913A1067 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id z5so3373870ejb.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lapishills-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fiqHtT7RM3WzdVaf5azsOoXD+KKQvgasDxDgxT5mUSk=; b=USudDu/YVIIiPCuM5AssREGGu58y+C8LUBE4AqUXBHp75GyTZNuGt7F7y505fU2uOP aLDDRcZIP6qZeP/OuiYklzMIgsBNVH+HMyoPAmnIu9NfI3EQJDxDbsIH3VzaYMdFNbQX 8uE3Dcl4dbJRfh1pSdupGau3psi+SD8AD9V9BHR3J3rcSkrX5jcc+3i5YhR8c68NhNQ2 x125BZrQBr3gvUmpRrMSQA6z7uWMt071Cuei4GSihfZ1eGO2ldB4xEUYUSXGQSl8NHRb G838sfO138srkTJVAEke5ornNjZ+yODmGeXyJoJdUFhlVV3uby5Djd63xILQEredtnoT qxMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fiqHtT7RM3WzdVaf5azsOoXD+KKQvgasDxDgxT5mUSk=; b=QA9Nmt4Qjp5jeq3k6E1diO+eIC74UCuVko0kBymn9zHsNPeTIqC7YZKMNGoheOXy2T OhOUv7foo9tZ2FH4rF6DriWwSWsmRqmlpAsgkxIY2cqLzdkLy4iZzpg12A6IlPCCux5r jLmaSFW0xjUmIh7jSQ1KTf82zLbXHScVxD+w/nH227eJ2pTUwzuIwRYrXjf3bj3ixpei 4Z+8db9Qfi9nV5i6GjT/gK9KWP4k1Lp62A0zp9J9DOgIK0CoF2erkFNtxAa+RoumNX20 sibnpHSn1RnTAddx3/+JjSdf/gO03tso7igolFnDNEzEi6Qzpc29jLHBfLnKKh4AceVo 13aA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/Px+TFogZ9lD+202Tb7NFWK9A3DAhQ2Fm333Ii+fW+Eo0QhLw AzSzb/KjsOPTHUKjDK283nHVdUalqXh8wTnCnQpSAA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIXgIPK/+lQbtbhvDFfGjJqNG2tkappho+zNXhKnO8W6keFKbY3k4LdtPK8SIQ5QaKGJGrhel2Tr4jsJ3dpwI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b5c1:: with SMTP id ep1mr8806442ejb.528.1590784930938; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com> <MW3PR11MB4570A46D75B2A1E08CA886F5C1B70@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MW3PR11MB4570A46D75B2A1E08CA886F5C1B70@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Dirk Steinberg <dirk@lapishills.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 23:42:00 +0300
Message-ID: <CAFqxzqaUcWoF3JipdXdNv7TEgYBkbG5fY=3zK7gcfU27cNH3=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b9219705a6cf7aed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/49yGITywNF0VqxE9_Z257JoBuEM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 20:42:16 -0000
Hello, looking at the draft what I see is a new data plane (incompatible with anything else that has existed as far) that semantically does the same what MPLS has been doing for over 20 years: mapping a fixed-length label to some kind of rewrite information. While having a different encapsulation format it is semantically equivalent to MPLS and it also retains the biggest drawback of MPLS: being based on a mapping table. This implies that the mapping table needs to be disseminated (read: protocol changes in all protocols) while still not allowing aggregation and also not providing any advantage from an architectural point of view over existing solutions. The fact that this encapsulation is IPv6-based is nothing new at all. The equivalent semantics can be achieved using MPLS over UDP that is already described in RFC 8663. I fail to see any significant innovation that would justify the effort of introducing a new encapsulation and introducing changes to all routing protocols. Therefore I do not support the adoption of draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr at present. Cheers, Dirk On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 4:56 PM Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant= 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Hello Spring WG, > > You might be very interested in this ongoing WG adoption poll for the CRH > proposal (what was previously introduced in Spring as part of the SRm6 > proposal). > > The authors are now claiming that theirs is a new IPv6 source routing > proposal that is unrelated to work/charter of Spring WG and not Segment > Routing [1] & [2]. > > The authors and 6man chairs seem to agree that this is not related to > Spring [3]. > > However, following the conversations in 6man, it seems clear to me that > this is indeed a new IPv6 data-plane proposal that builds on Spring work > [RFC8402] but avoids attribution to it to give an illusion of it being a > new standalone IPv6 Source Routing solution. > > If you were looking for a document that describes the architecture, > applicability, use-cases or requirements for this "new solution", well > there isn't anything other than the CRH draft itself [4] (the new version > does not talk about SRm6 anymore). > > Just thought of letting know ... > > Thanks, > Ketan > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/LheyFD_uwuHp7tiG8Y1CwKngDYI/ > [2] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/acyQ6VoObjnUVk6oOz7RoVLNey8/ > [3] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/BMoJM1NfneU5o0KRKUCkCj96g8c/ > [4] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-22 > > -----Original Message----- > From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Bob Hinden > Sent: 16 May 2020 03:44 > To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org> > Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> > Subject: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)" > > This message starts a two-week 6MAN call on adopting: > > Title: The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH) > Authors: R. Bonica, Y. Kamite, T. Niwa, A. Alston, L. Jalil > File Name: draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-21 > Document date: 2020-05-14 > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr > > as a working group item. Substantive comments regarding adopting this > document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can > be sent to the authors. > > Please note that this is an adoption call, it is not a w.g. last call for > advancement, adoption means that it will become a w.g. draft. As the > working group document, the w.g. will decide how the document should change > going forward. > > This adoption call will end on 29 May 2020. > > The chairs note there has been a lot of discussions on the list about this > draft. After discussing with our area directors, we think it is > appropriate to start a working group adoption call. The authors have been > active in resolving issues raised on the list. > > Could those who are willing to work on this document, either as > contributors, authors or reviewers please notify the list. That gives us > an indication of the energy level in the working group > to work on this. > > Regards, > Bob and Ole > > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xing Li
- Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Heade… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xing Li
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Melchior Aelmans
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tony Przygienda
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Vishal Singh
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Michael Richardson
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Wen Lin
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Naveen Kottapalli
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Parag Kaneriya
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Reply: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Ro… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- RE: Reply: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compac… Ron Bonica
- 答复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Weiqiang Cheng
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Huzhibo
- G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compa… Tom Herbert
- RE: G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 C… Huzhibo
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… 刘毅松
- 回复: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Srihari Sangli
- 回复: 回复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Peng Liu
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… stefano previdi
- Re: G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 C… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ahmed Abdelsalam
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… stefano previdi
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Reji Thomas
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Antonio Cianfrani
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Srihari Sangli
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Martin Horneffer
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tetsuya Murakami
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kalyani Rajaraman
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Michael McBride
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ran Pang(联通集团联通网络技术研究 院本部)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Miya Kohno
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kentaro Ebisawa
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… licong@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Fernando Gont
- 答复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… qinfengwei
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Satoru Matsushima
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Miya Kohno
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kamran Raza (skraza)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Fernando Gont
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
- Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… 이기훈/책임
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Comp… Dirk Steinberg
- comments on draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr (Re: A… 神明達哉
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Francois Clad (fclad)
- Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adopt… Tom Herbert
- Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Com… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Zafar Ali (zali)
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Richard Vallee (rvallee)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kris Michielsen
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Robert Raszuk
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… John Scudder
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Adrian Farrel
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jen Linkova
- Re: Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6… Erik Kline
- Followup Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The… Bob Hinden