RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"

"Templin (US), Fred L" <> Wed, 27 May 2020 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D263A0F1A for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OAvHnedbSaIC for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC3243A0FDA for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (8.15.2/8.15.2/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id 04RGFvI6014887; Wed, 27 May 2020 12:15:59 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=boeing-s1912; t=1590596159; bh=F3ENJzZ/vJ0KCxx0QPrJtCKDvZrut2lkqSYmMgMDr/o=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=p3jV8Njy5RHDIsy61YvQNy6p9cPWg0TTCdYFBXa92kzOJ+0GInMpIzkUwA34aH2Ob 9CMV3H3D6AWGlD4DaRjmmbCn7T4ILIuCX9Zms7uPCmoAZi04S8FqdSiprlYMyUltJB drTz8hcV8UkR+SvbBXwQoD4J3GWuJ92+aCUJzxARV+FKpVIUqoyy+5NRB7cu2//7ZW oii/3jnKTJXJRWNlxC6eSekCp2/WNxGCmbxq9NRtzleLbZ9LgVRX6cr/puktZ/6Fpt d0UT3Kxc+/89g5TP7GqzPi0Uc9gtPfcGSiGTs2wAFH5AkTJEp8YBQXlFRQ1ox83bpv Wf4YKpQgADqDw==
Received: from ( []) by (8.15.2/8.15.2/8.15.2/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTPS id 04RGFogn013809 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 May 2020 12:15:50 -0400
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.1.1979.3; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:15:49 -0700
Received: from ([fe80::e065:4e77:ac47:d9a8]) by ([fe80::e065:4e77:ac47:d9a8%2]) with mapi id 15.01.1979.003; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:15:49 -0700
From: "Templin (US), Fred L" <>
To: Bob Hinden <>, IPv6 List <>
Subject: RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Topic: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Index: AQHWKwYrYdjeS4DU7kubkMY4XJBQoai8duyA//+2FPA=
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 16:15:49 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
x-tm-snts-smtp: 3EAE7C10BF76E6715517E71D39EED9E1194A29C2563485E6C1FE8C313336C5962000:8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 16:16:18 -0000

I see value in CRH for real-world application areas including civil aviation and
worldwide ground transportation. I want to use it in the OMNI and AERO specs
that will apply to these domains and possibly many others.

Therefore, I support the adoption of draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr.


> On 16/05/20, 3:44 AM, "ipv6 on behalf of Bob Hinden" < on behalf of> wrote:
>     This message starts a two-week 6MAN call on adopting:
>      Title:          The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)
>      Authors:        R. Bonica, Y. Kamite, T. Niwa, A. Alston, L. Jalil
>      File Name:      draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-21
>      Document date:  2020-05-14
>     as a working group item. Substantive comments regarding adopting this document should be directed to the mailing list.  Editorial
> suggestions can be sent to the authors.
>     Please note that this is an adoption call, it is not a w.g. last call for advancement, adoption means that it will become a w.g. draft.  As
> the working group document, the w.g. will decide how the document should change going forward.
>     This adoption call will end on 29 May 2020.
>     The chairs note there has been a lot of discussions on the list about this draft.   After discussing with our area directors, we think it is
> appropriate to start a working group adoption call.  The authors have been active in resolving issues raised on the list.
>     Could those who are willing to work on this document, either as contributors, authors or reviewers please notify the list.   That gives
> us an indication of the energy level in the working group
>     to work on this.
>     Regards,
>     Bob and Ole
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> Administrative Requests:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------