Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> Fri, 22 May 2020 19:05 UTC
Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB7B3A00C4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 12:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=Uz4294T6; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=h0FAKTfr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XQDtGSgLIXVv for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 12:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C2B53A00D4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 12:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108158.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04MJ4HiD017014; Fri, 22 May 2020 12:05:16 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=ZXXTW6t9GRGCB+pFxQcgZwMiEiazrIuZtpCHus7X7rs=; b=Uz4294T6vDXZVJqyUIBsY1AJdlLt7JHXwROpSzVS8FQEFZJ1oCn/bkrmIrNan0SeRfyE nzy8u2KfbICpyRyZaSUJJzmpO1meTlmvz2zhjgLC9JMtg0Dc+nM6cg7U6okLOM7rbd9X Mj2B3ZbuSiV/6YLYmZRJ7bjUstTySpddO7H/AgiAYVAIAPZ3pvJOIyzQFd4AFHiOnW4B wRwZ/b05BgU+R3nwyQy4SimhyTcpSK0uMUfivDJ0c007/+/RKDeYHwl/ufxSbrHw09Lk JYbwfHOs+dWcRx1bRpabd3pmy36tWJAHrGz3gCdb4nho2kRwNW2nITpjEpb7fTMfcR3y 6g==
Received: from nam12-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12lp2168.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.59.168]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 316784sa9k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 22 May 2020 12:05:16 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=BzR9ofT7TVGmNBxqUb0ftjSo8aEXOWsujwMGe1fhNtZv300OOfag26wxy49fSnREfR9A+mnVq8VvQtwYFJOrvfeUatuMUk/vje68/LNznKctldyThZUKs8Tmb+xaKmpSvxAzAJU3A01m8a2f6xWJP5BtK4ngbMQzBzjzsWLexu4H13x7GNTE1nP3uQrABRlpmlUEXyTYhAK6UZCbNCgcpGns5pGwt3mpTGaBjgGXubWDAlw61e7IhfaouYXTytZdqTfNgzrIsuCLP7PCKFpiOGNtq2bAJGFzY778wZR9Myf9FLr/z9+f6nls8QSkirA2g6J1LxuNatQox4Wkqrw2aw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZXXTW6t9GRGCB+pFxQcgZwMiEiazrIuZtpCHus7X7rs=; b=F6n3xb+vMN8ZG8alYtCb3yC+c/C0KpxpyWTPcdfiA9pp4hsJMOuJAZy3I6M9vS/y9/dVc/SCCrHGddsELZJwUHxCSnNlXQH8cH7Zoo+0qUGOTf2+GACfePVMDVgCFLMJgSe0v6bcTGDHBE7Se2gmI/VHYcISA27ERjj2IoLvKaQ/NBMLBNOROUG7vyViQ2TAqoLES2YCeQDqkkYSGVqU/jSWvzjXrRbO0boRV8C+VXMrf7k3+hMTYXMBZZgY1bZ8etpYKhGyP17TzxNPITw9Yd0Pb2HX7falsFSqIgBskhs3Tw1976MHrrPSmM+oNxAwAbeUOL1bLkU90W18GE1opw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZXXTW6t9GRGCB+pFxQcgZwMiEiazrIuZtpCHus7X7rs=; b=h0FAKTfrKJsmuQOqTE9chNyVWF6h1m6563S27zKJMwsmpWqySu8r5MkR3skYE2ukZyPWzcCLOp513aNVN38X2ZDIGs+LavcqzFoZPzUGc1kLxHcTEz1KmzfYpqvbCQpCQETOqrjHPxv76vAOlfBl3tMyBTd7Hq121Q+hQZ6pDO4=
Received: from BYAPR05MB5078.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:9d::32) by BYAPR05MB4133.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a02:83::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3045.8; Fri, 22 May 2020 19:05:14 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB5078.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3440:a7bc:2ba1:9ac0]) by BYAPR05MB5078.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3440:a7bc:2ba1:9ac0%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.019; Fri, 22 May 2020 19:05:14 +0000
From: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
To: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Topic: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Index: AQHWKwYsDLoJys5cHkiznPySQXAET6iygKWAgACYAQCAAF4sgIABCvqQ
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 19:05:14 +0000
Message-ID: <7733F587-ED89-4978-BE47-3C5886596B09@juniper.net>
References: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com> <MW3PR11MB457033A9113B88BBD95CF39BC1B70@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <ad139d74-0d25-9e70-407c-185f9042bcdc@gmail.com>, <MW3PR11MB4570344BDE1AA9F549EB5EFCC1B40@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MW3PR11MB4570344BDE1AA9F549EB5EFCC1B40@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [2600:1700:37a0:3ca0:18ea:4e8:d289:a58]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 88437559-fe6d-4232-36e0-08d7fe830f28
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB4133:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB4133931E9911C4C90B8658CBAAB40@BYAPR05MB4133.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 04111BAC64
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: yx2UA5kMjEFz++sQcxH+nUQPGz6dSIe2p2eKMwybT+bN95z752cg36f6akAefxP+vSu80D1C3ab9jxTUI5xqWIkYzvJhqY38YBSKeZmBEMPvnW2Iglp+9hiK9f8uy9VhZQ/YQ9j1anyNiDgJbeP+dIpEXKLHrCJtKSvAZALmA/d0IG8dz3LGjb6ysFhETRwuuR4UF4P8X6xHPNkRxKUeWv92eitmfRCmoDWIZwGgh1/ARbw3DdYcP9e+pRCCG4YYjllnNeDdrMr7ysfHfwKeZi9RzGjN43YugTAyyMbwwHXH6exufWNvsmcWpgovEL1b
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR05MB5078.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(346002)(136003)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(91956017)(36756003)(66476007)(2906002)(66446008)(316002)(4326008)(5660300002)(54906003)(478600001)(8936002)(66556008)(66946007)(64756008)(186003)(76116006)(6486002)(6506007)(71200400001)(8676002)(86362001)(2616005)(53546011)(6512007)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 88437559-fe6d-4232-36e0-08d7fe830f28
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 May 2020 19:05:14.2200 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 61/ZksowtA3IU1L9i2DRCueqmLlwLhU0lET0u75WmU6xS0XN7Wx9nGnp+4Aks3WE
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB4133
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-22_07:2020-05-22, 2020-05-22 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=962 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005220149
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/EQSCNNaBxF2MZ5Ax86IrcVeibeQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 19:05:22 -0000
Ketan, > On May 21, 2020, at 11:10 PM, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > [KT] Definitely. We constantly build on existing work. SRm6 was trying to do that. But the current document does not provide any attribution to Spring architecture and body or work. The authors in fact deny this has anything to do with Segment Routing. It would seem like the authors are not giving the due to years of work done in Spring. And that makes one wonder why so because the previous versions of this document did have such references to Spring work that was purposefully removed by the authors. I’m not aware of the authors having denied that CRH is factored out from their earlier work on SRm6 (it would be silly to do that since SRm6 cites CRH normatively), nor that SRm6 is in the SR space (it’s right there in the name). On the contrary, my recollection is that this has been explicitly acknowledged during one or more 6man meetings. Although I don’t speak for them, I have confidence the authors would be willing to update the acks as appropriate (for that matter, if it becomes a WG document it’s not solely the authors’ choice to make). I’m not an author so I won’t presume to answer for them regarding references that were removed, but generally when I’m writing a document I provide the references needed to support the body text, neither more nor less; if the refactoring of the work makes it possible to understand without reference to those documents, then they shouldn’t be in the references. The SRm6 draft does indeed cite the CRH draft, and this is as it should be — upper layers cite lower layers, not the other way around. BGP cites TCP, but TCP doesn’t cite BGP, etc. In fact, idnits will complain if a document is cited but never mentioned in the body text, this is so much of a best practice it’s baked into our tool chain. Regarding “previous versions of this document did have such references to Spring work”, I looked back in the document history and see that 00 through 04 cite draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header, because those versions list all defined routing headers in the introduction, and that’s one of them. Later versions shorten the introduction and thus the reference isn’t needed. It seems like overreach to try to ascribe some kind of nefarious purpose to this simple edit. Various other RH were also cited by 00 through 04, and then the citations removed (e.g. to RFC 5095), for the same reason. Your insinuation that there’s an attempt by the authors to engage in some kind of plagiaristic behavior is both hurtful and disruptive. If you can support your insinuations with facts, please present them if you feel it advances the dialogue, otherwise please stop. Thanks, —John
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xing Li
- Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Heade… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xing Li
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Melchior Aelmans
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tony Przygienda
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Vishal Singh
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Michael Richardson
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Wen Lin
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Naveen Kottapalli
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Parag Kaneriya
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Reply: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Ro… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- RE: Reply: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compac… Ron Bonica
- 答复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Weiqiang Cheng
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Huzhibo
- G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compa… Tom Herbert
- RE: G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 C… Huzhibo
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… 刘毅松
- 回复: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Srihari Sangli
- 回复: 回复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Peng Liu
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… stefano previdi
- Re: G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 C… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ahmed Abdelsalam
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… stefano previdi
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Reji Thomas
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Antonio Cianfrani
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Srihari Sangli
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Martin Horneffer
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tetsuya Murakami
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kalyani Rajaraman
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Michael McBride
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ran Pang(联通集团联通网络技术研究 院本部)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Miya Kohno
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kentaro Ebisawa
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… licong@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Fernando Gont
- 答复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… qinfengwei
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Satoru Matsushima
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Miya Kohno
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kamran Raza (skraza)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Fernando Gont
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
- Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… 이기훈/책임
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Comp… Dirk Steinberg
- comments on draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr (Re: A… 神明達哉
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Francois Clad (fclad)
- Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adopt… Tom Herbert
- Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Com… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Zafar Ali (zali)
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Richard Vallee (rvallee)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kris Michielsen
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Robert Raszuk
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… John Scudder
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Adrian Farrel
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jen Linkova
- Re: Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6… Erik Kline
- Followup Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The… Bob Hinden