RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
"Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com> Fri, 22 May 2020 11:07 UTC
Return-Path: <pcamaril@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FED53A0B0B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 04:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=ClXlaH/C; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=cKJxVTnQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SZ7rOKWwZc-V for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 04:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B88A3A0B05 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 04:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=18653; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1590145671; x=1591355271; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=mryjZyJVfUWKcR5aXXEgjrlWOOwX2wvcGvtwxdWcCyc=; b=ClXlaH/Cx2unv3unioq+9SyjsCNzVZYGJGIscxJEdkrWgIVoKL48Qpua bVo8ZPbUg6z/l7raDxYxiELH8hp0V9/054tOgdHMdFQXzftTZmUYrTDN+ dlpbCeiBHgrD3CG5lC+fYFNdmg2qdzi6xWqMDnNpsaDCZE4OsprlQC/qO M=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:sR7tWhNFuMT6Zd3pHFAl6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEvKwx3lDMVITfrflDjrmev6PhXDkG5pCM+DAHfYdXXhAIwcMRg0Q7AcGDBEG6SZyibyEzEMlYElMw+Xa9PBtaHc//YxvZpXjhpTIXEw/0YAxyIOm9E4XOjsOxgua1/ZCbYwhBiDenJ71oKxDjpgTKvc5Qioxneas=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CmCQDXscde/4YNJK1mgQmCbC9RB29YLywKh2ADjUCJeo5CglIDVQsBAQEMAQElCAIEAQGERAKCHCQ4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEFBG2FVgyFcgEBAQEDEgsQEwEBKQMECAsEAgEIEQQBAS8hER0IAgQBEggTB4MFgX5NAy4BDqItAoE5iGF0gTSDAQEBBYEyAYQODQuCDgMGgTiCY4lfGoFBP4FUgk0+gh5JAQEDgWQrgxqCLZgIJYEJiVCPJDNKCoJUiCmLVYR4gmOJAYMrjm+QTYltgkyRKAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSKBVnAVGiGCNQEBMlAYDZQyhRSFQnQ3AgYBBwEBAwl8i3YBgQ8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,421,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217";a="770643564"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 22 May 2020 11:07:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04MB7nwE029881 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 May 2020 11:07:49 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 22 May 2020 06:07:49 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 22 May 2020 06:07:49 -0500
Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 May 2020 06:07:49 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PWKfxOB7iXMupvyPWb/cXFdlNkxehlWj6635IKaCA2GJGVI5jarRmRVc1AQymbOxof7zbQKMsJAPV/71d2jQ43eyXTacZqyIOpoOFSvuOhJk0zK7fNw1EFtFDDiotuD74z5ueBtYcffqhYeOEHAoRWQKUz/wavtB+zM58MaBCDrDdNS8nIg1yuftNTg3duSk/wtEywAYgyAGDj1MrNjVXRWURIDz60BwBYYSWiVZ5GtuA3LrLvtKQTGIGaLoK45jSs9Z/Gca0aAtbfyBiTMc26ELbHUgvdYt86XBhSbAAeDV0BBML0HStzQrxTrjF21IqHd+XftLJHca1run/EDZqQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hI3PlWqIzltS14wolEbWpZOCP3S2n777eNlYCOGBOLk=; b=WTVXi67/GIktjikP+SQ0bUk2DiD/iqGmgI1utQQMYljrDc6QThweTheKjMGaASGEIEWMVcqOvEkCf9lFYD71+TvxwtVki80VZgyDdT3Wph4TmS2i1Mud11081saBpZG7fhQwsdR2TNGu1zihsKpZHlhu1B7Va8QHlwT9omk7TvhEp+LaqNsYKcz6IFXB5pM+4OywAti1GzSJxaeFul58LBijD6aKHnwNVY3NDXhJDd/83PB/3hu4IkCc3E0nrUBVyX8stY30sVhv1TebxPXy/ldEpZueyoJCvRrnozaqvjfSTvmSesPN0bjbWd+ToMlUWESbUk080gP2FI/8NgfCfw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hI3PlWqIzltS14wolEbWpZOCP3S2n777eNlYCOGBOLk=; b=cKJxVTnQ5fQOxxV+ZvxmuZenTWdA1fdzcypyOYQYrKbIY5Qc6TZDp+RqmRJZqKybeXJDRi/u1TnNq0Us2bxdHBv+n8U1yZxfQ6CJFEYBeHaSGH3k/AbTd9IIjHFjFq198Y5gItAU0Z4Q/nfEdB05RgryE66OFcAxEwvDSvJcbe8=
Received: from MWHPR11MB1374.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:24::8) by MWHPR11MB2048.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:27::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3000.26; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:07:47 +0000
Received: from MWHPR11MB1374.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3919:ef10:f837:9efc]) by MWHPR11MB1374.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3919:ef10:f837:9efc%9]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.027; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:07:47 +0000
From: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Topic: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Index: AQHWKwY4GBs9ahMSgUitoGcS9ml+GKiz4lcA
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 11:07:21 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 22 May 2020 11:07:00 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB1374A8212FD04309F25C2C5CC9B40@MWHPR11MB1374.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.57]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fbfd8ef4-1381-4374-93f9-08d7fe405c69
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR11MB2048:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR11MB204823F5584A9C1DAC0D9CC0C9B40@MWHPR11MB2048.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 04111BAC64
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: xFpb8ioZXqrlXTNUCjpNq8mqgA0SJ8jTq2mTKUpSvPKjw3XTQjYY3ERIe7Uyvt2zxMG6Jy6zuZAzNeHXx6MXvMHWQaoAlCBFk/R34wKflEKsXQTOlU02k0A/+uZ4MBCeOfBiW+ppe/N7sRzaq6cORYfSE5lr9sQ3ypomPijuR5m+oaER6E1CwrQgtcMIbd+K9nCJNtUlDJmCMdUWYJGz2qSzpIgp57bPXhdH+q/1RLVrIxG7Tyb4Vd5CMA33WBEekCwneVkLP7HVJuLxWW9AFmEDPPKFgudlTFKYQni2NvW9d51TC/CdBGRGXP54IRhJ2xMqNwTSzJFSkvMJrArK6Zi4DFa1cawRefrqJH01pVRMsb3Kw6AccNV2UGxJdgj9PHhyxLVfTCTIvw2QxmSnzjq+62QFy7j7WnbdxScbfbgXy+E79Qd0RsdnGJwJra6Dc0AQSv+OZLl9jJUXOA34RQPxtjSSAWStnmy5JyN13/wJ6IWLJEckv0YRiMjAM1n0LNYoJ9IKf5ab3zu8UOyMpg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MWHPR11MB1374.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(396003)(376002)(366004)(346002)(136003)(8676002)(53546011)(76116006)(66476007)(316002)(86362001)(6506007)(26005)(71200400001)(186003)(966005)(55016002)(66946007)(110136005)(66446008)(64756008)(8936002)(66556008)(5660300002)(52536014)(7696005)(478600001)(6666004)(9686003)(2906002)(66574014)(166002)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: Bo57ftbKWEOmA0mX0TsU8IXmQwqWJtZvSkWbsHIrxKd3yPUH4PJu53gMWarEI7TECFoyBf6wX3S4abtAqk0dhtQSP6DZPdCI3a67hMHDMvk9A2rCmfXAxXuw6WZsW9EnQeqGzsBvkOqI8WGF0DP5irom++KT9OVkgr7ykYLfqMPTMj3n2SfXdOZnqc6D+cgNI0FMWEcU00zPE2RlSrpmY5Iti0rm4CbLbgsPgLM961ZS5F/F/LDoUyC720Dp+eI+acjSxolBZYVzWCzq92EQ+3bJ48x2bKksB2RYi2qxnul1XzmHA/88NyYyj6Nahv2Zi0Nq3k5EeY5itSBqxLPltU+T8LXNrTzBpiaO/OlJxeerGQVNP3naRyNpu9OzdDp00ojWNCp07om3GeCSZzOVmk/meYaia6DAy6HzJ2BjQKRUYIshXQ4PoSEwanU/p9ecq91W91C8n+4VTkycLmn/7uaD22x066y+y3UhYVetV5c=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MWHPR11MB1374A8212FD04309F25C2C5CC9B40MWHPR11MB1374namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fbfd8ef4-1381-4374-93f9-08d7fe405c69
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 May 2020 11:07:47.7319 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: kxIoAgZTsquPVTSu0cmWmiWHpL4hJJD2C58MV27vX0sxTS1R5B8f+0vUPCGGu+sRgkZ0r9lwL+gDxEprXPHUTA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR11MB2048
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/5csFPA14MX_9cPKNW8QgQ5io9xA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 11:07:55 -0000
Bob, Ole, I do not support the adoption of this document. Reasons below: 1.- 6man is an IPv6 maintenance group. This proposal is defining a new routing header with no sort of document, input or requirement from the Routing Area. While certainly this group does not need any sort of permission from routing, uncoordinated protocol development is harmful. This point has already been made by others. 2.- This is not a standalone document. Despite from the document stating that the CRH-FIB will be populated by means of CLI, I think everyone in this group would oppose to that; configuring all 2^16 labels manually in all routers is an operational burden... We will need control plane extensions such as draft-bonica-lsr-crh-isis-extensions, but again, we do not have the requirements or use-cases from Routing Area as to know what we need to support/build. 3.- The authors have not provided a document discussing applicability, use-cases or requirements. This approach of building a solution without understanding the problem is in my opinion utterly wrong. This is already causing confusion as for example in the 16b vs 32b discussion. Also, from BCP22: " Standards track documents must include a description of the protocol. This description must address the protocol's purpose, intended functions, services it provides, and, the arena, circumstances, or any special considerations of the protocol's use. The authors of a protocol specification will have a great deal of knowledge as to the reason for the protocol. However, the reader is more likely to have general networking knowledge and experience, rather than expertise in a particular protocol. An explanation of it's purpose and use will give the reader a reference point for understanding the protocol, and where it fits in the Internet. The STD 54/RFC 2328 was recommended to the STDGUIDE working group as providing a good example of this in its "Protocol Overview" section. The protocol's general description must also provide information on the relationship between the different parties to the protocol. This can be done by showing typical packet sequences. This also applies to the algorithms used by a protocol. A detailed description of the algorithms or citation of readily available references that give such a description is necessary." In summary, we are polling whether to adopt a document that is ignoring BCPs, doing uncoordinated development within the IETF areas, and with a bunch of unanswered technical questions on the mailer. Additionally, I believe this proposal has issues with scalability, and requires additional ASIC resources as recognized by the authors [1]. Thanks, Pablo. [1].- https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/aLhIQ2btTfNkJ4ghruuXbm3zY30/ -----Original Message----- From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Bob Hinden Sent: sábado, 16 de mayo de 2020 0:14 To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org> Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Subject: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)" This message starts a two-week 6MAN call on adopting: Title: The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH) Authors: R. Bonica, Y. Kamite, T. Niwa, A. Alston, L. Jalil File Name: draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-21 Document date: 2020-05-14 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr as a working group item. Substantive comments regarding adopting this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors. Please note that this is an adoption call, it is not a w.g. last call for advancement, adoption means that it will become a w.g. draft. As the working group document, the w.g. will decide how the document should change going forward. This adoption call will end on 29 May 2020. The chairs note there has been a lot of discussions on the list about this draft. After discussing with our area directors, we think it is appropriate to start a working group adoption call. The authors have been active in resolving issues raised on the list. Could those who are willing to work on this document, either as contributors, authors or reviewers please notify the list. That gives us an indication of the energy level in the working group to work on this. Regards, Bob and Ole
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xing Li
- Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Heade… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xing Li
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Melchior Aelmans
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tony Przygienda
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Vishal Singh
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mark Smith
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Michael Richardson
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Wen Lin
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Naveen Kottapalli
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Andrew Alston
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Parag Kaneriya
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Reply: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Ro… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… John Scudder
- RE: Reply: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compac… Ron Bonica
- 答复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Weiqiang Cheng
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Huzhibo
- G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compa… Tom Herbert
- RE: G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 C… Huzhibo
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… 刘毅松
- 回复: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Srihari Sangli
- 回复: 回复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Peng Liu
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… stefano previdi
- Re: G-SRv6 (was Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 C… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ahmed Abdelsalam
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… stefano previdi
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Mach Chen
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Reji Thomas
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Antonio Cianfrani
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Srihari Sangli
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ron Bonica
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Martin Horneffer
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tetsuya Murakami
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kalyani Rajaraman
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Michael McBride
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ran Pang(联通集团联通网络技术研究 院本部)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Miya Kohno
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kentaro Ebisawa
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… licong@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Fernando Gont
- 答复: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… qinfengwei
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Satoru Matsushima
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Miya Kohno
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kamran Raza (skraza)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Fernando Gont
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
- Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… 이기훈/책임
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- RE: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routi… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Comp… Dirk Steinberg
- comments on draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr (Re: A… 神明達哉
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Francois Clad (fclad)
- Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: Adopt… Tom Herbert
- Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Com… Bob Hinden
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Zafar Ali (zali)
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Greg Mirsky
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Richard Vallee (rvallee)
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Kris Michielsen
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Robert Raszuk
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… John Scudder
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Nick Hilliard
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Adrian Farrel
- RE: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… James Guichard
- Re: Compatibility with SRH requirement (was Re: A… Tom Herbert
- Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing H… Jen Linkova
- Re: Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The IPv6… Erik Kline
- Followup Conclusion of the Adoption Call for "The… Bob Hinden