Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"

Satoru Matsushima <> Thu, 28 May 2020 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38C73A0E8B for <>; Thu, 28 May 2020 05:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X8zXuP0Lf8SM for <>; Thu, 28 May 2020 05:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72EAD3A0E8A for <>; Thu, 28 May 2020 05:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id r10so13432356pgv.8 for <>; Thu, 28 May 2020 05:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/dkq1T4uCodd58vsVwqMthmqhS2py8gnmzeaTwNHPjo=; b=S3miM/ir4zYuvQ9LIGrjDBDog72YO4NB3JFfQgBSj93o0KqQFFWzCyhiEsxGV3YPo2 1iZPDRnD9h0ePQJ1A6lOjUJIxgIjxOrag+g5rrUYUp3VbBkPEIiiDdVW3ZdtNt2VrK7E hC7tV7rOuFrVb7YFo91PqVX+kN7ODsezDXSij1viZBFPGvNlgOZCBQXvqVS4ws+EYarj pRKzR0UIKnvWYxVSNSKyWQAO76EA1zB7tjBCXdZ2N0t2rmsBIabG05LaaeOJk36hwlh+ eVZMR4sI98khjXNbyK7gfexdy9ZB4L4Vo250UyidmKyHxMMcQLOpB0yYhJhwOPGYvZgH m1BA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/dkq1T4uCodd58vsVwqMthmqhS2py8gnmzeaTwNHPjo=; b=agqnOnMO9QkjvuaYifPsXj7goAs3COqSuMTKGQRsbtrVtdB637fBzsAhV3NOvB5Bv7 VvNWneUWQl9oj7d9G9t9qJIR21CC5v/usnfPzLRedaGzYZleQVyUSevG/vZyP+BaAi4A EQ9f2l0zKOc3IgZMxOOZYH9O2Zgy8wSakVs6xZXaroi1BeTixM5ca9srHawoA+418cGH /mYSR1kwnK4vWw9AAwJnEl5oq1ejFPmrk8Z8F7R8SxOIGxabE0/ZGCh9+l+gD9lkvbAQ CtQpmbPq6Jrlena29nm22O2wiJI7yUWfmoRpBP1+jGsoROD7M6p4DyPyJvwE6jGhX65c 0GOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dbN79FTtYRmA/zXVrw3cDFvu+tTUqCWv2VLXs7P9M5oZHgtlS 4qs/ZhkL9tpxllsL79TmODdkSY3F
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/W9uEfr2q+5JuRbCVO3xWXFOr7amQV8UVT9FYPaZz7nWjVMhEhw4G2YG3A1k4Jx7hLsLzJg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:4563:: with SMTP id u35mr2863237pgk.163.1590670690530; Thu, 28 May 2020 05:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2400:2411:8900:0:65ff:9064:86ca:e2c3? ([2400:2411:8900:0:65ff:9064:86ca:e2c3]) by with ESMTPSA id 25sm5374908pjk.50.2020. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 May 2020 05:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.\))
Subject: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
From: Satoru Matsushima <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 21:58:06 +0900
Cc: Bob Hinden <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <>
To: IPv6 List <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 12:58:13 -0000

Hello 6man,

After my review on the draft and the discussions through the long thread, I couldn't convince myself on that 6man need to introduce new ID spaces in addition to the 128-bits address space. Moreover there's no specific request from other areas/WGs. Hence my conclusion is that I do not support this adoption.

But I really thank the authors and the proponents all efforts on this work. The precious takeaways will be good input to the on-going work in Spring.


> 2020/05/16 7:13、Bob Hinden <>のメールt;のメール:
> This message starts a two-week 6MAN call on adopting:
> Title:          The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)
> Authors:        R. Bonica, Y. Kamite, T. Niwa, A. Alston, L. Jalil
> File Name:      draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-21
> Document date:  2020-05-14
> as a working group item. Substantive comments regarding adopting this document should be directed to the mailing list.  Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.
> Please note that this is an adoption call, it is not a w.g. last call for advancement, adoption means that it will become a w.g. draft.  As the working group document, the w.g. will decide how the document should change going forward.
> This adoption call will end on 29 May 2020.
> The chairs note there has been a lot of discussions on the list about this draft.   After discussing with our area directors, we think it is appropriate to start a working group adoption call.  The authors have been active in resolving issues raised on the list.
> Could those who are willing to work on this document, either as contributors, authors or reviewers please notify the list.   That gives us an indication of the energy level in the working group
> to work on this.
> Regards,
> Bob and Ole
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> Administrative Requests:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------