RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Wed, 27 May 2020 03:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27013A0DAD for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2020 20:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=XrgU4oAd; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=AO7NPqR+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9G8vZEAD_iUX for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2020 20:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7C1F3A0DAC for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2020 20:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108163.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04R3J1Bd016622; Tue, 26 May 2020 20:32:26 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=g8g0yY9q+4jRwYCJeTghsCj8O/Zmojxsp/0JbkbZqYA=; b=XrgU4oAdMxxAHn0CoNQKYbnlUqU9UhK0iE4bx/1ySvPNL/PV9GV4StpHJkFK1ine8e/c /OzNfWsm8ZMIqj8pxCcU7rlqAz1TZFr7rROVeIv7G1PKp1+zcpCL+36m/6YesHVTDGq3 NRdE3Qo0ye+PvlcQRCYCE0/gPFmeCokwoje08QJwg1pkkJg6ZvF+uWXNvR6285Ek9/RR z6eoW4OMyEhjdYWLcbB2fMh0YhQY/ALy6EFTqBgSGvveggt3p3xxJBVWp0igIpErgpyO X50C2stQdp37zDGvvsiaww/EdT0yz0GBfQMSgDkcjVGMxbdTu6w/ngrPem/eE89XG0gb 4A==
Received: from nam02-sn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam02lp2055.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.36.55]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 316y2s5pas-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 26 May 2020 20:32:25 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=P+K7DdxI8chxniOzYHgl/v8TmAKeD+Oj2EMRuOP1UwHW5NE+1VJKxqxd2ryA7jXGFpvGOhPcopVQycR4mCLP8qX8c98T2Y2BTdLKZ84gnbOLSBEM601Jorvv8rny+3/iYV8LMksxgbpRzZ9CGJmqMr9R4z1NUK3gnauW80LP9kweYvdZMSVzH5DkM4zFbN8tBYt4Kk/cAP7BgBOg28iQRv9BpIn0EPxaP2XioHO92WF0ganO3XloBLmE/Fwk91tFFl019cDQJ84tvqcKw9gAxUTlYeDaCuBdQ7JGO25MHSh4mVyQmWPk/NunLMmFuSllF8RjgzdeFD6HNzWPczDPsw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=g8g0yY9q+4jRwYCJeTghsCj8O/Zmojxsp/0JbkbZqYA=; b=CVMLEnMf2cRA5j9PGjh4FTZT7Vz252rPTdDgl12CcuJs64030VrHgtbFnfdd0PjZB+Rgd5I5a+aM+MaE+7/fMa79uWV6VG7Hnajjk7Pfe47jsIq/fvgoXpJtsUCykcdtBaJJOzvO0jzH/QDBWRVlNhc3ebA094PRlQ3DrQLJhH7nGhta/DNY3Dbx9r2nSkx24hM+clz1Mt4kdl/Cn7RW6CMCShkYi0Gz5sZmO+y15FNqZWoV5qTMCcbD2b5uu91HqxRTQfhqyKk8wW21pbkzMC5b6fkZx4XmUOYSuHBesx2ETgHSwiuvgqDmmSXnFuPSl/3yJ4fYZul89TAoskcXog==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=g8g0yY9q+4jRwYCJeTghsCj8O/Zmojxsp/0JbkbZqYA=; b=AO7NPqR+MBE6N1uPcJCzOxQleWuWqK7NLknnB/WhNiefGuhqxATy0rr+pJAJzJ4fHB2OwKqeJxwPmW7Oipc3RyvCRN3jq/QyAW3ycfzJI5nI4OC+iLw0OI8+9NSm3LNwB2D9J4GtTjGfBFs5zCAY9cAXTc1XUCeC//zvonDzTjM=
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:122::15) by DM6PR05MB5194.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:7f::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3045.8; Wed, 27 May 2020 03:32:23 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c020:3bf5:7230:75e3]) by DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c020:3bf5:7230:75e3%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3045.014; Wed, 27 May 2020 03:32:23 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Topic: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Index: AQHWKwYspvGUDSz9d0mNMkulZqetX6i7RfcAgAAR7zA=
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 03:32:23 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR05MB634882796C9EC3E64A4B1000AEB10@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com> <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE297BA004D@dggeml510-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE297BA004D@dggeml510-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-05-27T03:32:20Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=7d82697e-020a-4d6e-924b-e8fc799bf107; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=2
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.4.0.45
dlp-reaction: no-action
authentication-results: huawei.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;huawei.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [108.28.233.91]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5fd68753-a1f1-479b-dea0-08d801ee920e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB5194:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR05MB5194B339ADBF0ADA481F24B3AEB10@DM6PR05MB5194.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 04163EF38A
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: HvXTpAL46u9RVbyUQZ0cPBKQCHi9c5OTzdbNtG/3KbnZBSGYSrMHJV3d3X2kHq9vNh6mrSNTira2h88gWEBNFvSGzG0vb6nJzjaE+WNIgDB20ah2CG0yPIh+2fit1HTyDJF/sb6Cz4e4rLL5DLJh3tjXl7blaeOdm86emDMgBaDTFYsVl6KirHk8+AA5NhbfSJtpwdhAb+eWPLTC6UHyhLC8xsgQ7F6OTXKzI8ja7gTC5VKlzbfOWSqhHqQpnQK46pF+maFv1jXR6mKq+NMbTCfh9GGSRFxLjg4YxCb67JIone/R6yx90nAy4lQ8msk5Qkaqhdfn/6tOmm7PSfDcfUMfz6ZyDOrBE/EhLvx0d+81gLX3Ktv4xsZUln4jK02+1ibRuX7+5EHEG7baNibEZQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(346002)(396003)(53546011)(6506007)(5660300002)(966005)(86362001)(26005)(478600001)(316002)(186003)(83380400001)(8676002)(8936002)(33656002)(2906002)(7696005)(9686003)(66556008)(64756008)(76116006)(66446008)(66946007)(52536014)(110136005)(71200400001)(55016002)(66476007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5fd68753-a1f1-479b-dea0-08d801ee920e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 May 2020 03:32:23.6507 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: k8+0W0z72pkL+QYP8Lg8rlie0iglaAoarOsa8OS8ghisEDzlTuJKqEZcMogyGV4GA2hAUNBQ/Py1TBzU3Z2Hcw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB5194
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-05-26_04:2020-05-26, 2020-05-26 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005270023
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/mGBSyq7mq3A-JUau4txqpnCA6_Q>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 03:32:33 -0000

Mach,

The CRH is unique in the following respect. It does not rely on an instruction or a path being encoded in the IPv6 Destination Address. It relies only on RFC 4291 IP Address semantics.

Can you show me another IPv6 traffic steering solution that:

- is equally compressed
- does not rely on an instruction being encoded in the IPv6 destination address
- does not rely on all endpoints being numbered from the same IPv6 prefix

                                                                                                  Ron



Juniper Business Use Only

-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Mach Chen
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 10:25 PM
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>om>; IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"

[External Email. Be cautious of content]


If the draft intents to provide a mapping based Segment Routing solution, there are SR-MPLS, SR-MPLS over IP exist, and there are implementations that work very well; seems no need to define a new one;

If the draft intents to provide a header compression solution to SRv6, there are several candidate solutions under discussion; seems it's premature to consider just adopting one and ignoring others;

If the draft intents to be one of the building blocks of a new competing IPv6 based Segment Routing solution, given the community has been working on SRv6 for so many years, it needs to prove that the new solution has much better merits than SRv6;

So, based on the above, I do not support the adoption at this moment.

Best regards,
Mach

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bob Hinden
> Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 6:14 AM
> To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
> Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
> Subject: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
>
> This message starts a two-week 6MAN call on adopting:
>
>  Title:          The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)
>  Authors:        R. Bonica, Y. Kamite, T. Niwa, A. Alston, L. Jalil
>  File Name:      draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-21
>  Document date:  2020-05-14
>
>  
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6
> man-comp-rtg-hdr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RFfjmZf_NdYDfA4BeXQjkrOe5nDx8fFfYnrJ8
> UyCSeGfcx_3QbeQW7FjgwyIXhFe$
>
> as a working group item. Substantive comments regarding adopting this 
> document should be directed to the mailing list.  Editorial 
> suggestions can be sent to the authors.
>
> Please note that this is an adoption call, it is not a w.g. last call 
> for advancement, adoption means that it will become a w.g. draft.  As 
> the working group document, the w.g. will decide how the document 
> should change going forward.
>
> This adoption call will end on 29 May 2020.
>
> The chairs note there has been a lot of discussions on the list about this draft.
> After discussing with our area directors, we think it is appropriate 
> to start a working group adoption call.  The authors have been active 
> in resolving issues raised on the list.
>
> Could those who are willing to work on this document, either as contributors,
> authors or reviewers please notify the list.   That gives us an indication of
> the energy level in the working group
> to work on this.
>
> Regards,
> Bob and Ole
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RFfjmZf_NdYDfA4BeXQjkrOe5nDx8fFfYnrJ8UyCSeGfcx_3QbeQW7Fjg-IpFdTb$
--------------------------------------------------------------------