Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"

"Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)" <swaagraw@cisco.com> Fri, 29 May 2020 05:19 UTC

Return-Path: <swaagraw@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577783A0837 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2020 22:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=KcVu9zwN; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=F2ec5dn3
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gRn03nSP7SP9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2020 22:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED44A3A0843 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2020 22:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=638; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1590729547; x=1591939147; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=7kT5oNPcy7iRtlyCL44URCk9Q/NQMe/VUSiBy0/Ds/w=; b=KcVu9zwNB0XhuqFs9hBb546p8Av2XaubDrVTIrNh4fjwne8dMTtljF9g SFHQJ2yuEKKg8kPCWf6sXd18SIU/3swwi7Le++RKr+XBCN+Si97F6pI0f 8Z02hEkoBR2wxdifcT8EUiL5gsMHIIXJEUW/t8KtgxdxfztRK2dFI7RBO s=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AF1cyIR8HNDt/ef9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ65?= =?us-ascii?q?0hzqhDabmn44+7ZRaN5PhxghnOR4qIo/5Hiu+DtafmVCRA5Juaq3kNfdRKUA?= =?us-ascii?q?NNksQZmQEsQavnQU32JfLndWo2ScJFUlI2/nynPw5SAsmtL1HXq2e5uDgVHB?= =?us-ascii?q?i3PAFpJ+PzT4jVicn/1+2795DJJQtSgz/oarJpJxLwpgLU5cQ=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AeBgCvmtBe/49dJa1mHgEBCxIMQIE?= =?us-ascii?q?/C4FQUgeBRy8sCoQbg0YDpgqBLoEkA1ULAQEBDAEBLQIEAQGERAIXggQCJDQ?= =?us-ascii?q?JDgIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FWQyFcwIBAxILBhEMAQE4DwIBCBoCJgICAjA?= =?us-ascii?q?VEAIELgeDBIJMAy4BpQQCgTmIYXaBMoMBAQEFgkmCYBiCDgmBDiqCZIlgGoF?= =?us-ascii?q?BP4E4HIJNPodiM4ItkWuhUwqCVJhjHoJTmzquQQIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUzmBVnA?= =?us-ascii?q?VOyoBgj5QFwINkEAMF4NPilZ0NwIGAQcBAQMJfItRAYEPAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,447,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="776212519"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 29 May 2020 05:19:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04T5J5m0011954 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 05:19:06 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 29 May 2020 00:19:05 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 29 May 2020 00:19:04 -0500
Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 29 May 2020 00:19:04 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=O3Owidd3D2DjeEZo6d5Ufn8Xk3pb4wbG97v+XC/sblOMwrKF2DJuTM6bzpDwxOiaZh3TRN1D036ffuf67TzsC4Jb4c7G5F4f5mPbvcDF4rftRu6JRT0quSm9Bnqe06Whmf/8uxFbGjrqLpQp6bK2P0t4mAYB7pE5vlC/y2Zsx6gOQlVPlVPVQ013lFmzPmbpaPP1ZaRDJcE7y6hWNLvqmKkYY14owkjhoQzjVCUf7hYhzYHeQzxB/gMekdgHUDW+YP5finrVETvx6KSEyciWgipf02lzA7QyjhRgnO6cW6zKqPUntKyCxfm+nvWBcTd8O6M39NyS3O2Q6puvzsHV2A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7kT5oNPcy7iRtlyCL44URCk9Q/NQMe/VUSiBy0/Ds/w=; b=nDH7ZbXaZ56YkSGfxeeY3IZprXt6X0vprIqANiVSUTrBBAIoaz5cvTIOaH2Xd/C8KesR6rdfoulYpOyuO75KXnSdfhegvxqbS9w9RkF6ur8MiKX4eD2u/3tlWA4Wz8W9pXPPBU8cFQRAaVbxeWo/bpzC22J4v9nJIHkEmXo7iLfhO+3RUjmiwUfZFc2ENoFbvXewYnbl8Bu1NegOhKYA6BY5djU6RhvjdG1BKcHIrHo7D28aU3wXlJCWIu9HLvtpXkk+yNkIuCQBVACxt7eAEJDi572P3k7J452dXp0mShxbsQ7efLASbO6cwKd3nJ+id0qJo9rGDRTP0oJNT22HoQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7kT5oNPcy7iRtlyCL44URCk9Q/NQMe/VUSiBy0/Ds/w=; b=F2ec5dn3oXtTSith3znrTRRCpXLGMjt7h2Pg+gXEz5fTdDg9RDlyBa8tVdHvhrH1aEsnsEJRcsViQb/ut5T0jqwftY3sF+/y+O8vgHmdBXHfobBKvftpOGW1xH+rKDaHI0xFWN3dkQr01BW54mzDbk0AnfOFJ5il9XRFr6v7+Kw=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2888.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:8c::19) by BYAPR11MB3845.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:b4::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3045.19; Fri, 29 May 2020 05:19:03 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2888.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::518:891f:ac48:de55]) by BYAPR11MB2888.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::518:891f:ac48:de55%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.030; Fri, 29 May 2020 05:19:03 +0000
From: "Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)" <swaagraw@cisco.com>
To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Topic: Adoption Call for "The IPv6 Compact Routing Header (CRH)"
Thread-Index: AQHWNXiq46FJU/DRQkeK2ICagBvj3g==
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 05:19:03 +0000
Message-ID: <3F2FA72B-7AC9-4BED-B5CC-33F5C6A619FE@cisco.com>
References: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <19D30186-B180-4F65-BF00-7AD07CEF3925@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.16.200509
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [73.202.118.68]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6235f96a-4216-4c23-c6e3-08d8038fcda2
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3845:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB384559D27A81D2292E135104C78F0@BYAPR11MB3845.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 04180B6720
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: tXPwqDIuIWlJPLWvN5ZkO5dbBTCbWSbC0Z+L7PYfI7k6S9BLO5jaU0QUjnPOQEdJ9qMCnniLqHidRAaxlSgE+zVWmtb/KB051NhoWnqekqnkDsOkT6lsPuDaoWIgO4U3raKeLCWeAa3R34wv7Sp9gv9dMgnt07JNsTYi9OhRXYPSbG0dNHg5BVBaNuzO0aQgZYNBi2OArCzrmoieS/dO8FJhx7sQmpH+xwrUe2CyzQlPT5h11VDTzSeMuiLPMl0f5VnblZiFtAx3GM84/fAR11znPxO5bVw9B9FNHvud2O6uQYgvhnSVZk7lKmCTCpTRjJIqI7ri7AvMSf6Ti9Nhcg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB2888.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(376002)(2616005)(36756003)(478600001)(76116006)(26005)(66946007)(316002)(6506007)(6916009)(186003)(64756008)(8676002)(66556008)(66476007)(66446008)(33656002)(6486002)(8936002)(5660300002)(86362001)(4744005)(2906002)(71200400001)(6512007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: GQg2heZLvH7ZFGhI2hD2s36CdJpNOcBYbwgVlD2PTjNuch/kZ8x4ulI1RSaaTUm+orTcIyYgQwLODtJiyzl6wacpmDNIc+kiA9meGS36EehuQFlCAazqc2gdFP1uBJhb9FHVbHqjn13Fs2lS5g3e21gISf47jWzIePl1ZKkFtAEHX6n+PZgkPBxaZFctPUFI2DmE6rOHeqFwJuOSRQhfe0VDGjJyqbh0UOFq4OcNYbMT6jklFlwWr0OMv1mv7qyXgjyfgaaTF1LvkmnkNt+h6afYgWvqzHrdkfKwnujFF27TlRwbQLlST3+Z1xIOxeCccDcymgmhqyOctAV3afvpXt70XIrtGAtGS+IcDzHBn5lJd2wXCUxS7+hm4n9JRiULBiJU9ENsIphyprouXpcebOhdB3qk4E+ztHrhor0sOWoFipRrj6qB6Lp1ujeSBJ36qHkeWRbEkkVpjdvQAhqvwPitpfjkGEY/+QNYAYebsoE=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CE1E187B85A64B4A9BCCEB30BC6718D7@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6235f96a-4216-4c23-c6e3-08d8038fcda2
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 May 2020 05:19:03.6759 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: IUdC2pIepVG6SlgOJS001+AKsNqg6zN1rCr6wv+qEnsZihlBfDdUM/1mH3AhHrzwbNGElIbzUqsitO69efB8mQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3845
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/4WWGRjyxuJXUB5rK7aWihRhnREY>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 05:19:09 -0000

I do not support the WG adoption of this document.

CRH purpose is to “compress” a segment list of a source-routed policy in IPv6 networks. However, many members of the SPRING working group have multiple solution for the specific purpose of minimizing the MTU overhead and/or supporting very long SID-lists on legacy hardware. As there are competing solutions in Spring, the basis for this work should be discussed in Spring wg, first.

Regards
Swadesh